Controlling of the Dirac band states of Pb-deposited graphene by using work function difference
Source abstract
Abstract
We have performed scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) in Pb-deposited bilayer graphene (BLG) on the SiC(0001) substrate to investigate the dependence of the electronic structures on the Pb-deposition amount. We have observed that the Pb atoms form islands by STM and the π bands of the BLG shift toward the Fermi level by ARPES. This hole-doping-like energy shift is enhanced as the amount of Pb is increased, and we were able to tune the Dirac gap to the Fermi level by 4 ML deposition. Considering the band dispersion, we suggest that the hole-doping-like effect is related to the difference between the work functions of Pb islands and BLG/SiC; the work function of BLG/SiC is lower than that of Pb. Our results propose an easy way of band tuning for graphene with an appropriate selection of both the substrate and deposited material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Topological Materials and Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Applied Physics, Waseda University 1 , Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan
Synchrotron Light Application Center, Saga University 2 , Tosu, Saga 841-0005, Japan
Department of Physics, University of Tokyo 3 , Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (WPI-MANA), National Institute for Materials Science 4 , Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 19543410.1103/physrevb.81.195434 ↗
2. Science · 2010 · 327 · 66210.1126/science.1184289 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 17210510.1063/1.3254329 ↗
4. Nature · 2009 · 459 · 82010.1038/nature08105 ↗
5. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 31510.1038/nmat2710 ↗
6. Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 77010.1038/nmat2003 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 12680510.1103/physrevlett.99.126805 ↗
8. Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 40610.1038/nmat2166 ↗
9. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 2011 · 80 · 02470510.1143/jpsj.80.024705 ↗
10. Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 382410.1039/c3nr04178f ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 24542110.1103/physrevb.94.245421 ↗
12. Small · 2016 · 12 · 395610.1002/smll.201600666 ↗
13. Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 208210.1002/adma.201100412 ↗
14. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 2265210.1021/jp404190c ↗
15. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1710510.1039/c8cp01814f ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 98 · 19544110.1103/physrevb.98.195441 ↗
17. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 983910.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00528 ↗
18. Surf. Sci. · 2001 · 478 · 5710.1016/s0039-6028(00)01064-5 ↗
19. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2007 · 78 · 01370510.1063/1.2432410 ↗
20. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2019 · 2054 · 04001110.1063/1.5084612 ↗
21. ISRN Condens. Matter Phys. · 2012 · 50168610.5402/2012/501686 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 19542510.1103/physrevb.79.195425 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 02680310.1103/physrevlett.101.026803 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 12110110.1103/physrevb.82.121101 ↗
25. 2D Mater. · 2015 · 2 · 04500110.1088/2053-1583/2/4/045001 ↗
26. 2D Mater. · 2017 · 4 · 01504310.1088/2053-1583/4/1/015043 ↗
27. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 29530310.1088/0022-3727/47/29/295303 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 23543610.1103/physrevb.83.235436 ↗
29. J. Appl. Phys. · 1977 · 48 · 472910.1063/1.323539 ↗