journal article·2021-08-01Open access

The influence of probe spacing and probe bias in a double Langmuir probe setup

Kai Morgan Kjølerbakken, Wojciech J. Miloch, Ketil Røed

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 8

Abstract

Multi-needle Langmuir probes are mounted on satellites and sounding rockets for high-frequency characterization of plasma in the ionosphere. Mounted on a spacecraft, the recorded probe current often differs from expected results. In this paper, we perform a numerical study using a particle in cell model to see how the spacing between the individual probes used in a multi-needle setup influences the measured current. We also study how the applied probe bias voltage can contribute to deviations. In our study, we use realistic electron temperatures and electron densities for the relevant part of the ionosphere. However, the results should be generally applicable and valid for other space environments as well as for laboratory Langmuir probe applications. From our study, we can see that when the distance is short, less than two Debye lengths, the current is highly affected, and we can see deviations of more than 60% compared to a single probe setup.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Plasma Diagnostics and Applications · Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, University of Oslo 1 , Oslo 0316, Norway

Norwegian Institute for Air Research 2 , Kjeller 2007, Norway

Funding

University of Oslo · Sigma 2

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. The charging spacecraft surface10.1029/rg019i004p00577 ↗
2. Potentials of surfaces in space10.1088/0034-4885/44/11/002 ↗
3. The theory of collectors in gaseous discharges10.1103/physrev.28.727 ↗
4. Langmuir probe measurements in the ionosphere10.1029/jz064i010p01627 ↗
5. Understanding Langmuir probe current-voltage characteristics10.1119/1.2772282 ↗
6. Temporal limits of a rapidly swept Langmuir probe10.1063/1.3449588 ↗
7. A new Langmuir probe concept for rapid sampling of space plasma electron density10.1088/0957-0233/21/8/085902 ↗
8. Wake effects and mach cones behind objects10.1088/0741-3335/52/12/124004 ↗
9. Range of application for asymmetric double probes10.1143/jjap.30.3531 ↗
10. On the wake structure in streaming complex plasmas10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053016 ↗
11. A study of data analysis techniques for the multi-needle Langmuir probe10.1088/1361-6501/aab948 ↗
12. Finite-length effects on cylindrical Langmuir probes10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023016 ↗
13. Error analysis of multi-needle Langmuir probe measurement technique10.1063/1.5022820 ↗
14. Design of a multi-needle Langmuir probe system10.1088/0957-0233/21/8/085903 ↗
15. 1985
16. V. L. Rekaa, “Numerical simulations of kinetic plasmas,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, 2014.
17. PTetra, a tool to simulate low orbit satellite–plasma interaction10.1109/tps.2011.2172638 ↗
18. Kinetic simulation of spacecraft–environment interaction10.1109/tps.2017.2682229 ↗
19. Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities10.1002/nme.2579 ↗
20. Plasma self-heating and saturation due to numerical instabilities10.1016/0021-9991(80)90171-0 ↗
21. Nonphysical noises and instabilities in plasma simulation due to a spatial grid10.1016/0021-9991(72)90048-4 ↗