Non-stoichiometric WO3−x-based nanoscale memristor for high-density memory
Source abstract
Abstract
This work demonstrates forming-free and self-limiting resistive switching characteristics of non-stoichiometric WO3−x-based nanoscale devices without using any selector layer. Pt/W/WO3−x/Pt cross point and crossbar devices with individual cell dimensions of 200 × 400 nm2 have been fabricated using e-beam lithography, sputtering, and lift-off processes. The devices exhibited stable multi-level bipolar resistive switching with a high on/off ratio. In the crossbar device, the programmed resistance states were clearly distinguishable in the worst-case and arbitrary-case scenarios. The present study demonstrates that CMOS process-compatible WO3−x possesses great potential for designing future nanoscale resistive random access memories for high-density memory applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Advanced Technology Development Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, 721302 West Bengal, India
School of Nano Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, 721302 West Bengal, India
Materials Science Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, 721302 West Bengal, India
Cryogenic Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, 721302 West Bengal, India
Funding
Science and Engineering Research Board
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41928-018-0092-210.1038/s41928-018-0092-2 ↗
2. 10.1109/led.2019.292173710.1109/led.2019.2921737 ↗
3. M. Alayan, Investigation of HfO2 Based Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM): Characterization and Modeling of Cell Reliability and Novel Access Device (Université Grenoble Alpes, 2018).
4. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0211310.1021/acsnano.7b02113 ↗
5. 10.1109/ted.2014.232751410.1109/ted.2014.2327514 ↗
6. J. J. Huang, Y. M. Tseng, W. C. Luo, C. W. Hsu, and T. H. Hou, in Tech. Dig.—International Electron Devices Meeting IEDM (IEEE, 2011), pp. 733–736.
7. 10.1109/ted.2015.242671710.1109/ted.2015.2426717 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-6463/acc25810.1088/1361-6463/acc258 ↗
9. 10.1103/physrevlett.37.156410.1103/physrevlett.37.1564 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.11.03210.1016/j.materresbull.2016.11.032 ↗
11. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/47/47580210.1088/0953-8984/28/47/475802 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-017-10851-810.1038/s41598-017-10851-8 ↗
13. 10.1002/aelm.20220025010.1002/aelm.202200250 ↗
14. 10.1063/5.005351110.1063/5.0053511 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.6b0891510.1021/acsami.6b08915 ↗
16. 10.1016/0010-938x(80)90092-x10.1016/0010-938x(80)90092-x ↗
17. 10.1007/bf0268058610.1007/bf02680586 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00339-011-6273-810.1007/s00339-011-6273-8 ↗
19. 10.1109/led.2011.211432010.1109/led.2011.2114320 ↗
20. 10.1002/aelm.20190011510.1002/aelm.201900115 ↗
21. Y. I. Keser, K. Saka Yildirim, and D. Gokcen, in 2020 International Congr. Human-Computer Interact. Optim. Robot. Appl. (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1–8.10.1109/HORA49412.2020.9152883 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-019-11411-610.1038/s41467-019-11411-6 ↗
23. 10.1109/jeds.2019.294301710.1109/jeds.2019.2943017 ↗
24. B. Chen, Y. Lu, B. Gao, Y. H. Fu, F. F. Zhang, P. Huang, Y. S. Chen, L. F. Liu, X. Y. Liu, J. F. Kang, Y. Y. Wang, Z. Fang, H. Y. Yu, X. Li, X. P. Wang, N. Singh, G. Q. Lo, and D. L. Kwong, in 2011 International Electron Devices Meet. (IEEE, 2011), pp. 12.3.1–12.3.4.10.1109/IEDM.2011.6131539 ↗
25. A. Flocke and T. G. Noll, in ESSCIRC 2007—Proceedings of the 33rd Eur. Solid-State Circuits Conference (IEEE, 2007), pp. 328–331.10.1109/ESSCIRC.2007.4430310 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20140247210.1002/adma.201402472 ↗
27. 10.1016/s1369-7021(08)70119-610.1016/s1369-7021(08)70119-6 ↗
28. C. H. Ho, E. K. Lai, M. D. Lee, C. L. Pan, Y. D. Yao, K. Y. Hsieh, R. Liu, and C. Y. Lu, in Technical Papers—2007 Symposium on VLSI Technology (IEEE, 2007), p. 228.
29. 10.1021/acsami.6b0815410.1021/acsami.6b08154 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.487967710.1063/1.4879677 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.477976710.1063/1.4779767 ↗
32. 10.1007/bf0157508510.1007/bf01575085 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.513146410.1063/1.5131464 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.304387910.1063/1.3043879 ↗
35. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-37910.1186/1556-276X-8-379 ↗
36. A. Fantini, D. J. Wouters, R. Degraeve, L. Goux, L. Pantisano, G. Kar, Y.-Y. Chen, B. Govoreanu, J. A. Kittl, L. Altimime, and M. Jurczak, in 2012 4th IEEE International Mem. Work. (IEEE, 2012), pp. 1–4.10.1109/IMW.2012.6213646 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.8b0906810.1021/acsami.8b09068 ↗