journal article·2024-05-01Open access

Bioengineering solutions for expansive soil stabilization using waste materials: An experimental evaluation

Karanbir Singh Randhawa, Raman Kumar, Hamad Alkaabi, Meshel Q. Alkahtani, Saiful Islam, Chander Prakash, Rahul Kumar, Muhammad Imam Ammarullah

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 5

Abstract

Municipal solid waste incineration ash is the outcome/product of bioengineering science. The incineration or burning of municipal solid waste (MSW) reduces the volume of this biomass by 90%, and the residual ash can be used in several applications. In this study, the potential of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ash and calcium carbide residue (CCR) waste for stabilization of expansive soil has been experimentally evaluated. The abnormal shrink–swell characteristics of expansive soils pose several problems for civil engineering structures when these soils are used for construction in their original form. The study presents an experimental set-up to determine the best combination of additives to achieve the most favorable technical characteristics of expansive soil for civil engineering activities. The percentage of expansive soil has been kept fixed at 60% of the total weight of the mix for varying ratios of stabilizing agents. The optimization of the stabilizing materials is based on the highest strength parameters of the mix achieved for a particular ratio of additives and soil. The two stabilizing agents are waste materials, and their disposal through landfilling has become costly due to a scarcity of space and handling mechanisms. The values of strength parameters, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and split tensile strength (STS) of a treated mix are found to be highest for a unique combination of 60% lime stabilized expansive soil and 20% MSWI ash and an equal quantity (20%) of CCR. The cumulative effect of adding the best mix of additives to soil and curing time depicts an improvement of 526.03% in UCS and 463.41% in STS of the mix compared to one day and 28 days of curing time. There is scope for further study, such as adding some fibers to the finalized mix to reinforce the soil mix.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Punjabi University Patiala 1 , Punjab 147002, India

Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College 2 , Ludhiana, Punjab 141006, India

College of Administrative Sciences, Applied Science University 3 , East Al-Ekir 5055, Kingdom of Bahrain

Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University 4 , Abha 61421, Asir, Saudi Arabia

Center for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University 5 , Punjab 140401, India

Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University 6 , Himachal Pradesh 174103, India

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro 7 , Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia

Undip Biomechanics Engineering and Research Centre (UBM-ERC), Universitas Diponegoro 8 , Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia

Biomechanics and Biomedics Engineering Research Centre, Universitas Pasundan 9 , Bandung 40153, West Java, Indonesia

Funding

King Khalid University

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Proj. Manage. · 2023 · 8 · 25310.5267/j.jpm.2023.6.001 ↗
2. AgBioForum · 2021 · 23 · 37
3. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. · 2012 · 42 · 75
4. Buildings · 2023 · 13 · 100110.3390/buildings13041001 ↗
5. ACS Omega · 2023 · 8 · 2954310.1021/acsomega.3c03286 ↗
6. Adv. Civil Eng. · 2021 · 849309110.1155/2021/8493091 ↗
7. ACS Omega · 2024 · 9 · 801910.1021/acsomega.3c08164 ↗
8. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. · 2023 · 18 · e0189410.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01894 ↗
9. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. · 2024 · 12 · 11202410.1016/j.jece.2024.112024 ↗
10. Heliyon · 2019 · 5 · e0299910.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02999 ↗
11. Geotech. Geol. Eng. · 2006 · 24 · 176710.1007/s10706-006-6806-7 ↗
12. Environ. Eng. Sci. · 1998 · 15 · 29110.1089/ees.1998.15.291 ↗
13. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. · 2010 · 55 · 8310.1016/j.resconrec.2010.10.003 ↗
14. Soils Found. · 2013 · 53 · 47710.1016/j.sandf.2013.06.001 ↗
15. Constr. Build. Mater. · 2013 · 46 · 20310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.037 ↗
16. Waste Manage. · 2013 · 33 · 144210.1016/j.wasman.2013.02.009 ↗
17. Int. J. Eng. Res. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 3 · 202
18. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. · 2014 · 8 · 17310.1007/s40069-014-0073-4 ↗
19. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. · 2018 · 3 · 110.17577/IJERTCONV3IS29005 ↗
20. Environ. Sci. Policy · 2015 · 51 · 30410.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.024 ↗
21. Procedia Eng. · 2017 · 171 · 47610.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.359 ↗
22. Constr. Build. Mater. · 2018 · 169 · 36410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.209 ↗
23. WIT Trans. Built Environ. · 2019 · 182 · 28510.2495/UT180261 ↗
24. Constr. Build. Mater. · 2019 · 221 · 110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.157 ↗
25. Constr. Build. Mater. · 2019 · 223 · 44110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.010 ↗
26. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. · 2019 · 6 · 4668
27. Geotextiles Geomembr. · 2002 · 20 · 13510.1016/s0266-1144(02)00002-x ↗
28. Procedia Eng. · 2016 · 158 · 11610.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.415 ↗
29. mSystems · 2019 · 4 · 110.1128/msystems.00055-19 ↗
30. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. · 2021 · 111 · 10385710.1016/j.tust.2021.103857 ↗
31. J. Environ. Manage. · 2021 · 288 · 11248910.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112489 ↗
32. J. Civil Eng. Manage. · 2023 · 29 · 10710.3846/jcem.2023.16581 ↗
33. Environ. Technol. Innovation · 2023 · 30 · 10311610.1016/j.eti.2023.103116 ↗
34. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. · 2023 · 140 · 10525310.1016/j.tust.2023.105253 ↗
35. J. Build. Eng. · 2024 · 86 · 10897810.1016/j.jobe.2024.108978 ↗
36. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. · 2023 · 52 · 10377310.1016/j.csite.2023.103773 ↗
37. Molecules · 2022 · 27 · 489510.3390/molecules27154895 ↗
38. Geomech. Geoeng. · 2023 · 18 · 25310.1080/17486025.2022.2040605 ↗
39. Int. J. Med. Toxicol. Legal Med. · 2022 · 25 · 610.5958/0974-4614.2022.00002.x ↗
40. Nutr. Food Sci. · 2021 · 51 · 117710.1108/nfs-01-2021-0029 ↗
41. Ecol. Eng. · 2023 · 186 · 10684010.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106840 ↗
42. Int. J. Med. Toxicol. Legal Med. · 2018 · 21 · 21610.5958/0974-4614.2018.00071.2 ↗
43. Phytother. Res. · 2010 · 24 · 64010.1002/ptr.2891 ↗
44. Ecol. Eng. · 2022 · 176 · 10653910.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106539 ↗
45. Soils Found. · 1974 · 14 · 7110.3208/sandf1972.14.71 ↗
46. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. · 2019 · 11 · 42310.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.013 ↗
47. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. · 2014 · 73 · 61110.1007/s10064-013-0563-7 ↗
48. Transp. Geotech. · 2017 · 10 · 8510.1016/j.trgeo.2017.01.002 ↗
49. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2018 · 912512710.1155/2018/9125127 ↗
50. Int. J. GEOMATE · 2015 · 7 · 103310.21660/2014.14.140402 ↗
51. AgBioForum · 2021 · 23 · 50
52. AgBioForum · 2021 · 23 · 82
53. Malays. J. Med. Health Sci. · 2020 · 16 · 186
54. Syst. Rev. Pharm. · 2020 · 11 · 834
55. Manage. Environ. Qual. · 2022 · 33 · 116710.1108/meq-10-2021-0239 ↗