journal article·2018-01-01Open access

Casimir effect and graphene: Tunability, scalability, Casimir rotor

J. C. Martinez, X. Chen, M. B. A. Jalil

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

We study the combined effects of separated parallel disks, birefringence and surface currents on the Casimir force and torque. All three contribute to the Casimir force and surface currents from graphene permit tuning and switching from attraction to repulsion thus allowing for an oscillating Casimir force which can be relevant to parametric amplification applications. Only the latter two contribute to the Casimir torque and their combined effect can enhance the torque by at least tenfold (possibly more) compared to that due to birefringence alone, a hint at a scalable Casimir torque. We also consider a feasible non-contact rotor.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computational Nanoelectronics and Nano-Device Laboratory, National University of Singapore 1 , 4 Engineering Drive 3, Singapore 117576

National University of Singapore 2 , 4 Engineering Drive 3, Singapore 117583

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 2009
2. Izv. Vuzov. Ser. Radiofiz. · 1973 · 16 · 108610.1007/bf01031631 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. A · 1995 · 52 · 256910.1103/physreva.52.2569 ↗
4. Adv. Colloid and Interface Science · 1982 · 16 · 3110.1016/0001-8686(82)85004-5 ↗
5. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 182710.1103/revmodphys.81.1827 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 20430210.1063/1.4807796 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 11330410.1103/physrevb.80.113304 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 03300110.1103/physrevlett.89.033001 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 13450410.1063/1.4896732 ↗
10. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. · 2016 · 718 · 07200410.1088/1742-6596/718/7/072004 ↗
11. Europhys. Lett. · 2006 · 76 · 82210.1209/epl/i2006-10340-1 ↗
12. Europhys. Lett. · 2015 · 111 · 4400110.1209/0295-5075/111/44001 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. A · 2005 · 71 · 04210210.1103/physreva.71.042102 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. A · 2008 · 78 · 04210710.1103/physreva.78.042107 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. D · 2008 · 78 · 06501910.1103/physrevd.78.065019 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 14080110.1103/physrevlett.98.140801 ↗
17. Optics Express · 2013 · 21 · 1494310.1364/oe.21.014943 ↗
18. New J. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 10303010.1088/1367-2630/18/10/103030 ↗
19. New J. Phys. · 2006 · 8 · 24410.1088/1367-2630/8/10/244 ↗
20. J. Opt. Soc. Am. · 1972 · 62 · 50210.1364/josa.62.000502 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. A · 2005 · 72 · 02210210.1103/physreva.72.022102 ↗
22. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. · 2008 · 129 · 01200410.1088/1742-6596/129/1/012004 ↗
23. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2014 · 26 · 12320110.1088/0953-8984/26/12/123201 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 24541910.1103/PhysRevB.93.245419 ↗
25. Klimchitskaya · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 19540510.1103/physrevb.94.195405 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. A · 2016 · 93 · 01383210.1103/physreva.93.013832 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 041402 (R)10.1103/physrevb.85.041402 ↗
28. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2007 · 104 · 1839210.1073/pnas.0704772104 ↗
29. Nanotechnology · 2012 · 23 · 01570110.1088/0957-4484/23/1/015701 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. A · 1994 · 52 · 29710.1103/physreva.52.297 ↗
31. Sov. Phys. JETP · 1956 · 2 · 73
32. Phys. Rev. · 1936 · 50 · 11510.1103/physrev.50.115 ↗
33. Phys. Status Solidi B · 2011 · 248 · 206410.1002/pssb.201147150 ↗
34. Optics and Photonics News · 2016 · 27 · 30
35. Physics Today · 2016 · 69 · 1810.1063/pt.3.3382 ↗
36. Optics Express · 2013 · 21 · 763310.1364/oe.21.007633 ↗
37. 2D Material · 2015 · 3 · 015010
38. Phys. Rev B · 2010 · 82 · 15545910.1103/physrevb.82.155459 ↗
39. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 15542910.1103/physrevb.76.155429 ↗
40. Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 512 · 14610.1016/j.cplett.2011.07.013 ↗
41. Detecting Casimir torque with an optically levitated nanorod
42. Phys. Rev. A · 2002 · 64 · 04210210.1103/physreva.64.042102 ↗