journal article·2017-04-01Open access

Topography evolution of germanium thin films synthesized by pulsed laser deposition

P. Schumacher, S. G. Mayr, B. Rauschenbach

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 4

Abstract

Germanium thin films were deposited by Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD) onto single crystal Ge (100) and Si (100) substrates with a native oxide film on the surface. The topography of the surface was investigated by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) to evaluate the scaling behavior of the surface roughness of amorphous and polycrystalline Ge films grown on substrates with different roughnesses. Roughness evolution was interpreted within the framework of stochastic rate equations for thin film growth. Here the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation was used to describe the smoothening process. Additionally, a roughening regime was observed in which 3-dimensional growth occurred. Diffusion of the deposited Ge adatoms controlled the growth of the amorphous Ge thin films. The growth of polycrystalline thin Ge films was dominated by diffusion processes only in the initial stage of the growth.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Leibniz-Instiut für Oberflächenmodifizierung (IOM) 1 , Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany

Universität Leipzig 2 Fakultät für Physik und Geowissenschaften, , 04103 Leipzig, Germany

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Optics · 1965 · 4 · 14710.1364/ao.4.000147 ↗
2. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2000 · 72 · 31510.1103/revmodphys.72.315 ↗
3. 2014
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 18191610.1063/1.2108115 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. A · 2008 · 93 · 57910.1007/s00339-008-4696-7 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 76 · 08543110.1103/physrevb.76.085431 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 11311210.1063/1.2783473 ↗
8. Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 522 · 810.1016/s0039-6028(02)02413-5 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 10351510.1063/1.3388591 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 19610610.1103/physrevlett.87.196106 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 211810.1103/physrevb.62.2118 ↗
12. Europhys. Lett. · 1990 · 13 · 38910.1209/0295-5075/13/5/002 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 1957 · 28 · 33310.1063/1.1722742 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 1950 · 21 · 30110.1063/1.1699658 ↗
15. 1995
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1986 · 56 · 88910.1103/physrevlett.56.889 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. A · 1990 · 41 · 339910.1103/physreva.41.3399 ↗
18. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 1994 · 45 · 40110.1146/annurev.pc.45.100194.002153 ↗
19. 2001
20. Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. · 2006 · 9 · 45410.1016/j.mssp.2006.08.039 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 24610410.1103/physrevlett.87.246104 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 75 · 409110.1063/1.125546 ↗