journal article·2022-08-01Open access

A non-intrusive reduced order model using deep learning for realistic wind data generation for small unmanned aerial systems in urban spaces

Rohit K. S. S. Vuppala, Kursat Kara

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 8

Abstract

Realistic wind data are essential in developing, testing, and ensuring the safety of unmanned aerial systems in operation. Alternatives to Dryden and von Kármán turbulence models are required, aimed explicitly at urban air spaces to generate turbulent wind data. We present a novel method to generate realistic wind data for the safe operation of small unmanned aerial vehicles in urban spaces. We propose a non-intrusive reduced order modeling approach to replicate realistic wind data and predict wind fields. The method uses a well-established large-eddy simulation model, the parallelized large eddy simulation model, to generate high-fidelity data. To create a reduced-order model, we utilize proper orthogonal decomposition to extract modes from the three-dimensional space and use specialized recurrent neural networks and long-term short memory for stepping in time. This paper combines the traditional approach of using computational fluid dynamic simulations to generate wind data with deep learning and reduced-order modeling techniques to devise a methodology for a non-intrusive data-based model for wind field prediction. A simplistic model of an isolated urban subspace with a single building setup in neutral atmospheric conditions is considered a test case for the demonstration of the method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wind and Air Flow Studies · Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University , Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Transp. Res. Procedia · 2017 · 27 · 113710.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.031 ↗
3. Drone delivery? amazon moves closer with f.a.a
4. 2011
5. 2011
6. Appl. Math. Modell. · 2010 · 34 · 252010.1016/j.apm.2009.11.016 ↗
7. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. · 2004 · 87 · 12110.1007/s00703-003-0065-4 ↗
8. Urban For. Urban Greening · 2010 · 9 · 32310.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.002 ↗
9. Urban Stud. · 2009 · 46 · 41310.1177/0042098008099361 ↗
10. J. C. D. C. Siqueira, Modeling of Wind Phenomena and Analysis of Their Effects on UAV Trajectory Tracking Performance (Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, 2017), https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7347/.
11. S. A. Raza, “Autonomous UAV control for low-altitude flight in an urban gust environment,” Ph.D. thesis, Carleton University, 2015, https://carleton.ca/atarg/wp-content/uploads/Thesis_SAR_Final.pdf.
12. K. Kirk, C. Lederman, Y. Wang, and B. Kraczek, “The inclusion of realistic winds in a simulated environment for the study of wind-unmanned aircraft system (UAS) interactions,” Technical Report No. AD1170051 (DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, 2022); available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1170051.pdf.10.21236/AD1170051 ↗
13. Flying qualities of piloted airplanes
14. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. · 2011 · 99 · 10310.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.002 ↗
15. Large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary-layer gusts for small unmanned air systems
16. Variance reduction of quadcopter trajectory tracking in turbulent wind10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.11.160 ↗
17. M. Sutherland, “Urban wake field generation using LES for application to quadrotor flight,” Ph.D. thesis, Carleton University, 2015, https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/etd/6508407f-0cd2-4e17-ada8-5610a5662e0f/etd_pdf/91f3d0b9b769af997087d53d70b96580/sutherland-urbanwakefieldgenerationusinglesforapplication.pdf.
18. Energy Fuels · 2009 · 23 · 169510.1021/ef800984v ↗
19. 2011
20. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. · 2018 · 40 · B83410.1137/17m1145136 ↗
21. 1287
22. Phys. Fluids · 2019 · 31 · 01510510.1063/1.5061693 ↗
23. A turbulent eddy-viscocity surrogate modeling framework for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104777 ↗
24. AIAA J. · 2020 · 58 · 2510.2514/1.j058291 ↗
25. 2505
26. Realistic Wind Data Generation for Small Unmanned Air Systems in Urban Environment using Convolutional Autoencoders
27. 1688
28. Phys. Fluids · 2020 · 32 · 10510410.1063/5.0020526 ↗
29. Phys. Fluids · 2020 · 32 · 04711010.1063/1.5144661 ↗
30. Phys. Fluids · 2019 · 31 · 08510110.1063/1.5113494 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. E · 2019 · 100 · 05330610.1103/physreve.100.053306 ↗
32. Phys. Fluids · 2020 · 32 · 03660210.1063/5.0002051 ↗
33. Mathematics · 2020 · 8 · 57010.3390/math8040570 ↗
34. Fluids · 2018 · 3 · 8610.3390/fluids3040086 ↗
35. Phys. Rev. E · 2018 · 97 · 04232210.1103/physreve.97.042322 ↗
36. Geosci. Model Dev. · 2015 · 8 · 251510.5194/gmd-8-2515-2015 ↗
37. J. Comput. Phys. · 1975 · 18 · 37610.1016/0021-9991(75)90093-5 ↗
38. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. · 1980 · 18 · 49510.1007/bf00119502 ↗
39. J. Atmos. Sci. · 1998 · 55 · 173310.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<1733:litsls>2.0.co;2 ↗
40. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. · 2000 · 95 · 110.1023/a:1002428223156 ↗
41. Methods Comput. Phys. · 1977 · 17 · 17310.1016/b978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4 ↗
42. J. Comput. Phys. · 1989 · 84 · 5710.1016/0021-9991(89)90181-2 ↗
43. 2002
44. 2007
45. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. · 1988 · 31 · 28310.1016/0167-6105(88)90009-8 ↗
46. Fluid Dyn. Res. · 2002 · 31 · 28910.1016/s0169-5983(02)00127-2 ↗
47. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. · 2011 · 44 · 41910.1504/ijep.2011.038443 ↗
48. Computational and Information Systems Laboratory · 201910.5065/D6RX99HX ↗
49. 2022