A multiscale study of the influence of aggregate type on adhesion at the asphalt–aggregate interface

In order to examine the influence of aggregate type on the asphalt–aggregate interface, the adhesion performance between asphalt and aggregate was investigated at three scales. The pull-out test was conducted on asphalt and three kinds of aggregates at the macroscale to directly estimate the adhesion performance between them. At the microscale, the surface energies between asphalt and limestone, basalt, and andesite were examined through a surface energy experiment, and then the adhesion and debonding work were assessed. At the nanoscale, the interfacial behavior between six mineral compositions (SiO2, CaO, MgO, Al2O3, Fe2O3, and Na2O) of these aggregates and asphalt was determined using molecular dynamics simulation. The correlation of adhesion work at the microscale and nanoscale was further explored to unveil the bonding mechanisms between asphalt and aggregate. The macroscale results indicate that the adhesion force of andesite is slightly greater than that of limestone, probably because andesite has a greater surface roughness than limestone. The microscale results show the best adhesion and water stability between asphalt and limestone. The finding further explains that alkaline aggregates exhibit superior interfacial adhesion to asphalt. The nanoscale results show that the adhesion work of alkaline oxides with asphalt is more significant than that of acidic oxides with asphalt. Limestone and basalt have better adhesion to asphalt due to higher alkaline oxide content, while andesite has poorer adhesion to asphalt due to lower alkaline oxide and higher SiO2 content. The interfacial adhesion work increases from the microscale to the nanoscale by a factor of 2.91–4.75.