Comparison of the sensing mechanisms and capabilities of three functional materials surface-modified TFBG sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
Three functional materials were coated on tilted fiber Bragg grating (TFBG) sensors, and through the analysis of the characteristics of TBFG sensors’ amplitudes in the core and cladding modes, their abilities to sense humidity were compared. The mechanisms by which physical moisture absorption sensing was achieved through the three materials were investigated. The degree of sensitivity in terms of resonance wavelength in the cladding mode for the three coating materials was PAHP4 > PEDOT:PSS > GO. The sensitivity in the cladding modes of the tested sensor showed that the best resonance wavelength was as high as 0.0112 nm/% RH and was achieved for the TFBG coated with PAHP4 due to the hydrophilic groups around the material, which are good at forming hydrogen bond interactions with H2O.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Photonic and Optical Devices · Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology 1 , Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
Department of Photonics, National Sun Yat-Sen University 2 , Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 30310.1021/acsanm.9b01889 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 15112210.1063/1.1904716 ↗
3. Photonic Sens. · 2015 · 5 · 6010.1007/s13320-014-0218-8 ↗
4. Sensors · 2017 · 17 · 212910.3390/s17092129 ↗
5. IEEE Access · 2019 · 7 · 2664110.1109/access.2019.2901517 ↗
6. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 648310.1021/acsami.8b18904 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 06310510.1063/1.4908116 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 111 · 15310110.1063/1.4996603 ↗
9. J. Laser Micro/Nanoeng. · 2014 · 9 · 23010.2961/jlmn.2014.03.0009 ↗
10. Opt. Express · 2017 · 25 · 2368410.1364/oe.25.023684 ↗
11. J. Lightwave Technol. · 2020 · 38 · 248510.1109/jlt.2020.2969016 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 07370310.1063/1.3480601 ↗
13. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 1344110.1021/acsami.9b01737 ↗
14. APL Photonics · 2019 · 4 · 02080110.1063/1.5065415 ↗
15. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2005 · 17 · 86410.1109/lpt.2004.842786 ↗
16. Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2019 · 142 · 11150610.1016/j.bios.2019.111506 ↗
17. ACS Sens. · 2019 · 4 · 61310.1021/acssensors.8b01372 ↗
18. Opt. Lett. · 2004 · 29 · 24410.1364/ol.29.000244 ↗
19. APL Photonics · 2019 · 4 · 12610410.1063/1.5116683 ↗
20. Opt. Laser Technol. · 2016 · 78 · 1910.1016/j.optlastec.2015.10.007 ↗
21. Sens. Mater. · 2001 · 13 · 399
22. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2009 · 21 · 44110.1109/lpt.2009.2013185 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 03110710.1063/1.4959092 ↗
24. Biosensors · 2019 · 9 · 3610.3390/bios9010036 ↗
25. Thin Solid Films · 2013 · 536 · 21110.1016/j.tsf.2013.03.124 ↗
26. J. Lightwave Technol. · 1997 · 15 · 127710.1109/50.618322 ↗
27. Photonic Sens. · 2011 · 1 · 610.1007/s13320-010-0016-x ↗
28. Sens. Actuators, B · 2019 · 293 · 33610.1016/j.snb.2019.05.024 ↗