journal article·2017-02-01Open access

Enhancing the blocking temperature of perpendicular-exchange biased Cr2O3 thin films using buffer layers

Naoki Shimomura, Satya Prakash Pati, Tomohiro Nozaki, Tatsuo Shibata, Masashi Sahashi

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 2

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of buffer layers on the blocking temperature (TB) of perpendicular exchange bias of thin Cr2O3/Co exchange coupled films with a Ru spacer and revealed a high TB of 260 K for 20-nm-thick Cr2O3 thin films. By comparing the TB values of the 20-nm-thick Cr2O3 films on Pt and α-Fe2O3 buffers, we investigated the lattice strain effect on the TB. We show that higher TB values can be obtained using an α-Fe2O3 buffer, which is likely because of the lattice strain-induced increase in Cr2O3 magnetocrystalline anisotropy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tohoku University 1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, , Sendai 980-8579, Japan

TDK Corporation 2 Advanced Technology Development Center, , Chiba 272-0026, Japan

Japan Science and Technology Agency 3 ImPACT Program, , Tokyo 102-0076, Japan

Funding

ImPACT · Murata Fundation

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 20250810.1063/1.2388149 ↗
2. Sov. Phys. JETP · 1960 · 10 · 62810.1070/pu1961v004n02abeh003330 ↗
3. Sov. Phys. JETP · 1961 · 13 · 729
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 11720310.1103/physrevlett.94.117203 ↗
5. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 57910.1038/nmat2785 ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1966 · 2 · 44610.1109/tmag.1966.1065857 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 15240910.1063/1.4871515 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Express · 2014 · 7 · 11420110.7567/apex.7.114201 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17D90210.1063/1.4906322 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 13240710.1063/1.4916826 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 16240410.1063/1.4918940 ↗
12. Mater. Trans. · 2016 · 57 · 78110.2320/matertrans.me201506 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07C10110.1063/1.3535555 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 05443510.1103/physrevb.87.054435 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 22240210.1063/1.4880938 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6 · 11300710.7567/apex.6.113007 ↗
17. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 250540410.1109/tmag.2014.2324014 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 21240610.1063/1.4902828 ↗
19. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 390910.1143/apex.3.113001 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. · 1956 · 102 · 141310.1103/physrev.102.1413 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 437510.1063/1.373081 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 138 · A91210.1103/physrev.138.a912 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6 · 12300410.7567/apex.6.123004 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 22441710.1103/physrevb.94.224417 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 1965 · 36 · 98610.1063/1.1714290 ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Express · 2017 · 10 · 01300210.7567/apex.10.013002 ↗
27. Microscopy · 2013 · 62 · 53310.1093/jmicro/dft023 ↗
28. Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1398510.1038/ncomms13985 ↗
29. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17D13710.1063/1.4917263 ↗
30. J. Appl. Phys. · 1987 · 62 · 304710.1063/1.339367 ↗
31. J. Appl. Phys. · 1993 · 15 · 689210.1063/1.352426 ↗
32. J. Appl. Phys. · 1987 · 62 · 292910.1063/1.339374 ↗