journal article·2018-05-01Open access

Fabrication of Mg-X-O (X = Fe, Co, Ni, Cr, Mn, Ti, V, and Zn) barriers for magnetic tunnel junctions

K. Yakushiji, E. Kitagawa, T. Ochiai, H. Kubota, N. Shimomura, J. Ito, H. Yoda, S. Yuasa

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

We fabricated magnetic tunnel junctions with a 3d-transition material(X)-doped MgO (Mg-X-O) barrier, and evaluated the effect of the doping on magnetoresistance (MR) and microstructure. Among the variations of X (X = Fe, Co, Ni, Cr, Mn, Ti, V, and Zn), X = Fe and Mn showed a high MR ratio of more than 100%, even at a low resistance-area product of 3 Ωμm2. The microstructure analysis revealed that (001) textured orientation formed for X = Fe and Mn despite substantial doping (about 10 at%). The elemental mappings indicated that Fe atoms in the Mg-Fe-O barrier were segregated at the interfaces, while Mn atoms were evenly involved in the Mg-Mn-O barrier. This suggests that MgO has high adaptability for Fe and Mn dopants in terms of high MR ratio.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · ZnO doping and properties · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) 1 , Tsukuba, Japan

Corporate Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corporation 2 , Kawasaki, Japan

Funding

New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 10 · E8710.1016/j.cap.2009.12.021 ↗
2. IEDM Tech. Dig. · 2012 · 11.3
3. IEDM Tech. Dig. · 2013 · 3.1
4. Proceedings of the IEEE · 2016 · 104 · 179610.1109/jproc.2016.2590142 ↗
5. Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 95210.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.036 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 11010.1063/1.4977565 ↗
7. Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 86210.1038/nmat1256 ↗
8. Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 86810.1038/nmat1257 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 09250210.1063/1.1871344 ↗
10. J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · R33710.1088/0022-3727/40/21/r01 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 415910.1063/1.1376415 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 02040110.1103/physrevb.65.020401 ↗
13. Progress in Mater. Sci. · 2007 · 52 · 40110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.10.009 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 21250510.1063/1.3441409 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 12240410.1063/1.4977946 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2016 · 6 · 03401110.1103/physrevapplied.6.034011 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 24543610.1103/physrevb.85.245436 ↗
18. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 727710.1038/srep07277 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 24241610.1063/1.4953783 ↗
20. J. de Physique · 1979 · 40 · C210.1051/jphyscol:1979230 ↗
21. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 72110.1038/nmat2804 ↗
22. J. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 52 · 06300310.7567/jjap.52.063003 ↗
23. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3024910.1038/srep30249 ↗