Use of dual planar jets for the reduction of flow-induced noise
Source abstract
Abstract
The planar jet has been proposed to reduce the flow-induced noise. However, the self-noise emission from a single planar jet is a limiting factor on the performance based characteristics of this technology. Therefore, this research paper reports an alternative dual planar jets geometry in an attempt to minimize the self-noise of the single planar jet, thus, further enhancing total noise reduction in the application. Tandem cylinders are considered as the generic bluff body, which represents the source of flow-induced noise. Tests are conducted to capture noise reduction effects when using a single planar jet geometry. Subsequently, two different configurations of the dual planar jets geometry were tested in comparison. It is observed that the dual jets geometry achieves more noise reduction when compared to the single jet. Moreover, conclusions are made on the most efficient configuration in the dual jets geometry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Dublin 1 Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, , Dublin 2 Dublin, Ireland
National University of Defence Technology 2 College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, , Changsha 410073, China
University of Nigeria 3 Energy and Power Technology Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Nsukka, Enugu 400001, Nigeria
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Quenching of acoustic bandgaps by flow noise10.1063/1.3111797 ↗
2. Acoustic wave propagation in a macroscopically inhomogeneous porous medium saturated by a fluid10.1063/1.2431570 ↗
3. Acoustic barriers based on periodic arrays of scatterers10.1063/1.1533112 ↗
4. Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noisea doseresponse relationship10.1121/1.1815091 ↗
5. High speed train noise emission: Latest investigation of the aerodynamic/rolling noise contribution10.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.069 ↗
6. Prediction of wind noise radiated from passenger cars and its evaluation based on auralization10.1016/s0167-6105(99)00033-1 ↗
7. Almost 40 years of airframe noise research: What did we achieve?10.2514/1.44457 ↗
8. T. Sijpkes and J. Wickerhoff, “Aeroplane provided with noise-reducing means, as well as a landing gear and blowing means,” US Patent US20040104301 A1 (2004).
9. Use of plane jet for flow-induced noise reduction of tandem rods10.1088/1674-1056/25/6/064301 ↗
10. Reduction of landing gear noise using an air curtain
11. A study of planar jet flow control and perforated fairings for the reduction of the flow-induced noise of tandem rods in a cross-flow
12. Jet noise: since 195210.1007/s001620050072 ↗
13. Jet noise10.2514/3.1848 ↗
14. Studies of the influence of density on jet noise10.1016/s0022-460x(73)80141-5 ↗
15. The influence of temperature on shock-free supersonic jet noise10.1016/s0022-460x(75)80026-5 ↗
16. Jet noise10.1016/s0022-460x(73)80040-9 ↗
17. Noise of highly turbulent jets at low exhaust speeds10.2514/3.2994 ↗
18. Scattering of quadrupole sources near the end of a rigid semi-infinite circular pipe
19. Lip noise generated by flow separation from nozzle surfaces (1976-3)
20. Y. Kamotani and I. Greber, “Experiments on confined turbulent jets in cross flow,” NASA technical report (1974).10.2514/6.1973-647 ↗
21. Multiple tandem jets in cross-flow10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2006)132:9(971) ↗
22. Dynamics of single and twin circular jets in cross flow10.1007/s00348-010-0965-2 ↗