Coercivity enhancement of hot-deformed NdFeB magnet by doping R80Al20 (R = La, Ce, Dy, Tb) alloy powders
Source abstract
Abstract
Significant enhancement in coercivity for hot deformed (HD) NdFeB magnets is achieved by doping R80Al20 (R= La, Ce, Dy, Tb) alloy powders. All studied samples exhibit fine microstructure with good (00L) texture. By doping R80Al20 powders, the coercivity of HD NdFeB magnets is significantly increased from 16.0 kOe to 19.4 kOe, 20.0 kOe, 21.8 kOe, and 23.8 kOe for R = La, Ce, Dy, and Tb, respectively, while (BH)max is decreased from 41.5 MGOe to 39.3-40.8 MGOe slightly. Microstructure analysis shows that Ce or La prefers to distribute mostly at grain boundary, while Dy or Tb and Al locate at grain boundary and surface. The magnetic isolation due to R-rich phase containing Nd, Ce or La, Al at the grain boundary contributes to coercivity enhancement with the samples with R = La and Ce. In additional to magnetic isolation, the strengthened magnetic anisotropy field of 2:14:1 phase due to Tb or Dy, and slight Al substitutions gives rise to the significant enhancement of coercivity for those with R80Al20 (R = Dy and Tb).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, National Chung Cheng University , Chia-Yi 621, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1984 · 51 · 584
2. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1998 · 61 · 109910.1088/0034-4885/61/9/001 ↗
3. Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 82110.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
4. Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 52410.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.036 ↗
5. AIP Adv. · 2013 · 3 · 04213610.1063/1.4803657 ↗
6. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 290 · 123010.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.409 ↗
7. Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 306110.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.046 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17A73310.1063/1.4916542 ↗
9. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2014 · 26 · 06420210.1088/0953-8984/26/6/064202 ↗
10. Acta Mater. · 2016 · 115 · 38510.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.015 ↗
11. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 488 · 16535310.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165353 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17A76610.1063/1.4869062 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 20240310.1063/1.4936154 ↗
14. Acta Mater. · 2016 · 118 · 37410.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.001 ↗
15. Scr. Mater. · 2017 · 129 · 4410.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.020 ↗
16. J. Alloys Compds. · 2016 · 666 · 43210.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.227 ↗
17. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 497 · 16600210.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166002 ↗
18. Acta Mater. · 2016 · 115 · 35410.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.048 ↗
19. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2017 · 53 · 210070410.1109/tmag.2017.2703128 ↗
20. Scr. Mater. · 2018 · 146 · 22210.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.11.052 ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2018 · 54 · 210060510.1109/tmag.2018.2814626 ↗
22. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 478 · 4310.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.090 ↗
23. J. Alloys Compds. · 2013 · 549 · 36610.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.056 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 17240510.1063/1.4982679 ↗
25. Acta Mater. · 2018 · 154 · 34310.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.046 ↗