journal article·2020-07-01Open access

Deep learning surrogate model for kinetic Landau-fluid closure with collision

Libo Wang, X. Q. Xu, Ben Zhu, Chenhao Ma, Yi-an Lei

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 7

Abstract

In this work, the kinetic Landau-fluid (LF) closure with collision and periodic boundary condition is used in the development of the deep learning (DL) surrogate model. A classical neural network, namely, feedforward neural network or sometimes termed multilayer perceptron, is constructed and trained to learn the kinetic LF closure in the static limit and arbitrary mean free path in configuration space. The preliminary relation between best hyperparameters and critical parameters for data generation is found. Compared with the numerical approach (non-Fourier method) of the LF closure, the deep learning surrogate model shows an order of magnitude of improvement in terms of accuracy. Perhaps most importantly, the surrogate model closure has been integrated for the first time with fluid simulations. Our DL-enabled fluid simulations, for the first time, give the correct Landau damping rate for a wide range of wave vectors, while the Hammett–Perkins closure cannot produce the correct damping rate. We correctly connect the collisionless Hammett–Perkins closure and collisional Braginskii closure to reproduce the intrinsic nonlocal feature of the heat flux with DL techniques. We address the most concerning error accumulation problem and find that simulations with the deep learning surrogate model are as good as, if not better than, simulations with the analytic closure in terms of long-term numerical stability in the linear Landau damping test.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations · Model Reduction and Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fusion Simulation Center, State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics, Peking University 1 , Beijing 100871, China

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2 , Livermore, California 94550, USA

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 3 , Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China · Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. M. Francisquez, T. N. Bernard, B. Zhu, A. Hakim, B. N. Rogers, and G. W. Hammett, “Fluid & gyrokinetic turbulence in open field-line, helical plasmas,” arXiv:2002.11136 (2020).10.1063/5.0005333 ↗
2. Transport phenomena in a completely ionized gas10.1103/physrev.89.977 ↗
3. Transport processes in a plasma
4. Fluid moment models for Landau damping with application to the ion-temperature-gradient instability10.1103/physrevlett.64.3019 ↗
5. A Landau-fluid closure for arbitrary frequency response10.1063/1.5063916 ↗
6. New closures for more precise modeling of Landau damping in the fluid framework10.1103/physrevlett.121.135101 ↗
7. Toroidal gyrofluid equations for simulations of tokamak turbulence10.1063/1.871538 ↗
8. Landau fluid models of collisionless magnetohydrodynamics10.1063/1.872517 ↗
9. Modeling of tokamak divertor plasma for weakly collisional parallel electron transport10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.015 ↗
10. Collisionless kinetic-fluid closure and its application to the three-mode ion temperature gradient driven system10.1063/1.1367319 ↗
11. Impact of relative phase shift on inward turbulent spreading10.1063/1.4905644 ↗
12. Impact of inward turbulence spreading on energy loss of edge-localized modes10.1063/1.4920963 ↗
13. Global kinetic ballooning mode simulations in BOUT++10.1088/0029-5515/57/1/016002 ↗
14. Benchmark studies of the gyro-landau-fluid code and gyro-kinetic codes on kinetic ballooning modes10.1063/1.4944391 ↗
15. Machine learning surrogate models for Landau fluid closure10.1063/1.5129158 ↗
16. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092133 ↗
17. 2011
18. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance10.1017/jfm.2016.615 ↗
19. Predicting disruptive instabilities in controlled fusion plasmas through deep learning10.1038/s41586-019-1116-4 ↗
20. Self-consistent core-pedestal transport simulations with neural network accelerated models10.1088/1741-4326/aa7776 ↗
21. Imputation of faulty magnetic sensors with coupled bayesian and Gaussian processes to reconstruct the magnetic equilibrium in real time10.1063/1.5038938 ↗
22. A model for collision processes in gases10.1103/physrev.94.511 ↗
23. 2016
24. A fast non-fourier method for landau-fluid operators10.1063/1.4876617 ↗
25. Extension of Landau-fluid closure to weakly collisional plasma regime10.1016/j.cpc.2018.10.024 ↗
26. BOUT++: A framework for parallel plasma fluid simulations10.1016/j.cpc.2009.03.008 ↗
27. GDB: A global 3D two-fluid model of plasma turbulence and transport in the tokamak edge10.1016/j.cpc.2018.06.002 ↗