Comparison of dielectric breakdown properties for different carbon-fluoride insulating gases as SF6 alternatives
Source abstract
Abstract
As a widely used insulating medium, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is a greenhouse gas with very high global warming potential (GWP). Some carbon-fluoride gases have potential to replace SF6 in insulating applications. In order to reveal their different dielectric performance, this paper is devoted to a comparative study of dielectric breakdown properties for SF6 and four carbon-fluoride insulating gases i.e. CF3I, C2F6, C3F8, and c-C4F8 mixed with CO2, N2, and CF4 based on the numerical solution of Boltzmann equation. The electron energy distribution function (EEDF), reduced ionization coefficients α/N, reduced electron attachment coefficients η/N, and reduced critical electric field strength (E/N)cr are compared for various gas mixtures. Generally c-C4F8 presents the largest dielectric strength among the four carbon-fluoride insulating gases whichever buffer gas is mixed, while C2F6 presents the lowest dielectric strength. In terms of (E/N)cr and GWP, CF3I is a good eco-friendly insulating medium. However, with the addition of buffer gases, the (E/N)cr of CF3I mixtures declines more quickly than other mixtures. It is also found that the mixing of CF4 makes insulating mixtures depend more linearly on the proportions of buffer gas than CO2 and N2.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation · Aerogels and thermal insulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University 1 , No 2 Sipailou, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210096, P. R. China
State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, Xi'an Jiaotong University 2 , No 28 XianNing West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province 710049, P. R. China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 2016 · 23 · 257210.1109/tdei.2016.7736814 ↗
2. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 05350610.1063/1.4876744 ↗
3. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 35 · 307710.1088/0022-3727/35/23/307 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2007 · 35 · 121010.1109/tps.2007.905205 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 1996 · 24 · 21010.1109/27.491761 ↗
6. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 11350310.1063/1.4829032 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 09290110.1063/1.4943021 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 2010 · 17 · 119610.1109/tdei.2010.5539690 ↗
9. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 15560110.1088/1361-6463/aa5e89 ↗
10. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · 1998 · 27 · 110.1063/1.556016 ↗
11. The European Physical Journal D · 2015 · 6910.1140/epjd/e2015-60327-9 ↗
12. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 40520310.1088/0022-3727/47/40/405203 ↗
13. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · 420410.1088/0022-3727/39/19/012 ↗
14. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 46520210.1088/0022-3727/48/46/465202 ↗
15. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 03350210.1063/1.5012850 ↗
16. Environmental Science & Technology · 2017 · 52 · 369
17. AIP Advances · 2017 · 7 · 07500310.1063/1.4993305 ↗
18. Chemical Engineering Journal · 2018 · 336 · 3810.1016/j.cej.2017.11.051 ↗
19. 2015
20. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 15520510.1088/0022-3727/48/15/155205 ↗
21. Plasma Sources Science and Technology · 2005 · 14 · 72210.1088/0963-0252/14/4/011 ↗
22. Plasma Sources Science and Technology · 2016 · 25 · 05502510.1088/0963-0252/25/5/055025 ↗
23. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 14520210.1088/0022-3727/43/14/145202 ↗
24. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 37 · 152510.1088/0022-3727/37/11/003 ↗
25. Journal of the Korean Physical Society · 2003 · 43 · 513
26. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · 1998 · 27 · 88910.1063/1.556024 ↗
27. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · 2001 · 30 · 44910.1063/1.1372164 ↗
28. 2015
29. Chemical Reviews · 2002 · 102 · 23110.1021/cr990044u ↗