journal article·2015-09-01Open access

Significance of accurate diffraction corrections for the second harmonic wave in determining the acoustic nonlinearity parameter

Hyunjo Jeong, Shuzeng Zhang, Dan Barnard, Xiongbing Li

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 9

Abstract

The accurate measurement of acoustic nonlinearity parameter β for fluids or solids generally requires making corrections for diffraction effects due to finite size geometry of transmitter and receiver. These effects are well known in linear acoustics, while those for second harmonic waves have not been well addressed and therefore not properly considered in previous studies. In this work, we explicitly define the attenuation and diffraction corrections using the multi-Gaussian beam (MGB) equations which were developed from the quasilinear solutions of the KZK equation. The effects of making these corrections are examined through the simulation of β determination in water. Diffraction corrections are found to have more significant effects than attenuation corrections, and the β values of water can be estimated experimentally with less than 5% errors when the exact second harmonic diffraction corrections are used together with the negligible attenuation correction effects on the basis of linear frequency dependence between attenuation coefficients, α2 ≃ 2α1.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Underwater Acoustics Research · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Wonkwang University 1 Division of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, , Iksan, Jeonbuk 570-749, Republic of Korea

Central South University 2 School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, , Changsha, Hunan 410075, China

Iowa State University 3 Center for Nondestructive Evaluation, , Ames, IA 50010, USA

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Let. · 2008 · 92 · 21410610.1063/1.2937838 ↗
2. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 2006 · 120 · 126610.1121/1.2221557 ↗
3. Sov. Phys. Uspekhi · 1971 · 13 · 77810.1070/PU1971v013n06ABEH004281 ↗
4. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1974 · 55 · 72410.1121/1.1914589 ↗
5. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1951 · 23 · 110.1121/1.1906722 ↗
6. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1971 · 49 · 31910.1121/1.1912332 ↗
7. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1983 · 73 · 152510.1121/1.389413 ↗
8. Meas. Sci. Technol. · 1997 · 8 · 63410.1088/0957-0233/8/6/009 ↗
9. Int. J. Acoust. Vib. · 2008 · 13 · 151
10. 1981 · 527
11. 2008
12. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1988 · 83 · 175210.1121/1.396508 ↗
13. 2007
14. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1999 · 106 · 177110.1121/1.427926 ↗
15. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 2006 · 119 · 197110.1121/1.2169921 ↗
16. 2004
17. AIP Advances · 2015 · 5 · 07713310.1063/1.4926974 ↗
18. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation · 1991 · 11B · 2069
19. Ultrasonics · 2013 · 53 · 101210.1016/j.ultras.2013.01.008 ↗