journal article·2016-12-01Open access

Multimode optical feedback dynamics of InAs/GaAs quantum-dot lasers emitting on different lasing states

H. Huang, D. Arsenijević, K. Schires, T. Sadeev, D. Bimberg, F. Grillot

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 12

Abstract

Quantum dot lasers are envisioned to be the next generation of optical transmitters used for short-reach communication links, owing to their low threshold current and high temperature operation. However, in a context of steady increase in both speed and reach, quantum dot lasers emitting on their upper energy levels have been recently of greater interest as they are touted for their faster modulation dynamics. This work aims at further evaluating the potential impact of such lasers in communication links by characterizing their long-delay optical feedback responses as well as the role of the lasing states on the multimode dynamics of InAs/GaAs quantum-dot Fabry-Perot devices sharing the same design. Results unveil that the excited-state laser shows a much larger sensitivity to optical feedback, with a more complex route to chaos, and a first destabilization point occurring at lower feedback strengths than for a comparable ground-state laser, which remains almost unaffected.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Optical Network Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Université Paris-Saclay 1 CNRS LTCI, Télécom ParisTech, , 46 rue Barrault, 75013 Paris, France

Institut für Festkörperphysik, Technische Universität Berlin 2 , Berlin 10623, Germany

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Optical Fiber Communication Conference · 2014 · M2K.510.1364/ofc.2014.m2k.5 ↗
2. Electron. Lett. · 2008 · 44 · 39010.1049/el:20080395 ↗
3. 2012
4. 2012
5. Proc. IEEE · 2009 · 97 · 123910.1109/JPROC.2009.2014780 ↗
6. Photonics Res. · 2015 · 3 · B110.1364/PRJ.3.0000B1 ↗
7. Nat. Photon. · 2016 · 10 · 30710.1038/nphoton.2016.21 ↗
8. 2016
9. Electron. Lett. · 2003 · 39 · 181910.1049/el:20031153 ↗
10. 2012
11. IEEE J. of Selected Topics in Quantum Electron. · 2013 · 19 · 190081210.1109/JSTQE.2013.2246776 ↗
12. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2014 · 50 · 723
13. Journal of Physics: Conference Series · 2010 · 245 · 01208310.1088/1742-6596/245/1/012083 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 06110110.1063/1.3193664 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 01110310.1063/1.3535607 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 10410.1063/1.4875238 ↗
17. Proc. of SPIE · 2016 · 9892 · 98920s10.1117/12.2230758 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 08112410.1063/1.2338767 ↗
19. 2011
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 06111410.1063/1.3477955 ↗
21. Electron. Lett. · 2015 · 51 · 168610.1049/el.2015.2512 ↗
22. Opt. Express · 2010 · 18 · 1283210.1364/OE.18.012832 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 12110910.1063/1.4896576 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 23111010.1063/1.3667193 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 19110210.1063/1.4921173 ↗
26. Chin. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 33 · 12420410.1088/0256-307X/33/12/124204 ↗
27. AIP Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 10711510.1063/1.4933194 ↗
28. J. Cryst. Growth · 2003 · 251 · 72910.1016/S0022-0248(02)02506-X ↗
29. Proc. SPIE · 2016 · 9892 · 98920C
30. 2005
31. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1990 · 26 · 83310.1109/3.55523 ↗
32. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2005 · 17 · 136910.1109/LPT.2005.848279 ↗
33. IEEE J. Light. Technol. · 2012 · 30 · 33110.1109/JLT.2011.2179974 ↗
34. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 1296310.1103/PhysRevB.62.12963 ↗