Kinetics of alkali-based photocathode degradation
Source abstract
Abstract
We report on a kinetic model that describes the degradation of the quantum efficiency (QE) of Cs3Sb and negative electron affinity (NEA) GaAs photocathodes under UHV conditions. In addition to the generally accepted irreversible chemical change of a photocathode’s surface due to reactions with residual gases, such as O2, CO2, and H2O, the model incorporates an intermediate reversible physisorption step, similar to Langmuir adsorption. This intermediate step is needed to satisfactorily describe the strongly non-exponential QE degradation curves for two distinctly different classes of photocathodes –surface-activated and “bulk,” indicating that in both systems the QE degradation results from surface damage. The recovery of the QE upon improvement of vacuum conditions is also accurately predicted by this model with three parameters (rates of gas adsorption, desorption, and irreversible chemical reaction with the surface) comprising metrics to better characterize the lifetime of the cathodes, instead of time-pressure exposure expressed in Langmuir units.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates · Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry · Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Los Alamos National Laboratory 1 Accelerator Operations and Technology Division, , Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Los Alamos National Laboratory 2 Materials Physics and Applications Division, , Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Los Alamos National Laboratory 3 Chemistry Division, , Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Los Alamos National Laboratory 4 Theoretical Division, , Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Funding
Los Alamos National Laboratory
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A · 2010 · 622 · 65710.1016/j.nima.2010.06.100 ↗
2. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A · 2010 · 622 · 68510.1016/j.nima.2010.03.104 ↗
3. Applied Physics Letters · 2006 · 89 · 22410310.1063/1.2387968 ↗
4. Journal of Applied Physics · 2002 · 92 · 475810.1063/1.1505684 ↗
5. 1980
6. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A · 1997 · 385 · 38510.1016/S0168-9002(96)00809-1 ↗
7. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A · 1997 · 393 · 45510.1016/S0168-9002(97)00545-7 ↗
8. APL Materials · 2015 · 310.1063/1.4922319 ↗
9. Applications of Surface Science · 1983 · 16 · 25710.1016/0378-5963(83)90072-7 ↗
10. Applied Surface Science · 1996 · 99 · 36110.1016/0169-4332(96)00106-7 ↗
11. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · 2014 · 47 · 05511010.1088/0022-3727/47/5/055110 ↗
12. Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams · 2007 · 10 · 02350110.1103/PhysRevSTAB.10.023501 ↗
13. Solid State Communications · 1965 · 3 · 18910.1016/0038-1098(65)90289-9 ↗
14. Journal of Applied Physics · 2007 · 102 · 07490210.1063/1.2786028 ↗
15. Applied Physics Letters · 2013 · 103 · 10350410.1063/1.4820132 ↗
16. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A · 1998 · 411 · 38310.1016/S0168-9002(98)00350-7 ↗
17. Applied Physics Letters · 2011 · 99 · 15211010.1063/1.3652758 ↗
18. Journal of The American Chemical Society · 1918 · 40 · 136110.1021/ja02242a004 ↗