journal article·2012-03-01Open access

A combined Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror and multilayer lens for sub-10 nm x-ray focusing

A. Ruhlandt, T. Liese, V. Radisch, S. P. Krüger, M. Osterhoff, K. Giewekemeyer, H. U. Krebs, T. Salditt

AIP Advances· Volume 2· Issue 1

Abstract

We have used a combined optical system of a high gain elliptic Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror system (KB) and a multilayer Laue lens (MLL) positioned in the focal plane of the KB for hard x-rays nano-focusing. The two-step focusing scheme is based on a high acceptance and high gain elliptical mirror with moderate focal length and a MLL with ultra-short focal length. Importantly, fabrication constraints, i.e. in mirror polishing and bending, as well as MLL deposition can be significantly relaxed, since (a) the mirror focus in the range of 200-500 nm is sufficient, and (b) the number of layers of the MLL can be correspondingly small. First demonstrations of this setup at the coherence beamline of the PETRA III storage ring yield a highly divergent far-field diffraction pattern, from which the autocorrelation function of the near-field intensity distribution was obtained. The results show that the approach is well suited to reach smallest spot sizes in the sub-10nm range at high flux.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Universität Göttingen 1 Institut für Röntgenphysik, , Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany

Universität Göttingen 2 Institut für Materialphysik, , Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Adv. Phys. · 2010 · 59 · 110.1080/00018730903270926 ↗
2. 2006
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 12740110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.127401 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 22111410.1063/1.2912503 ↗
5. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2007 · 78 · 04610310.1063/1.2713439 ↗
6. J. Phys. Conf. Series · 2009 · 186 · 01207410.1088/1742-6596/186/1/012074 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 03340510.1103/PhysRevB.74.033405 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 24533110.1103/PhysRevB.73.245331 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 20480110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.204801 ↗
10. Nat. Phys. · 2010 · 6 · 12210.1038/nphys1457 ↗
11. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2011 · 1365 · 2410.1063/1.3625296 ↗
12. Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 1506910.1364/OE.19.015069 ↗
13. Nuc. Instrum. Meth. A · 2001 · 467-468 · 85710.1016/S0168-9002(01)00494-6 ↗
14. Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 965610.1364/OE.19.009656 ↗
15. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2010 · 81 · 07371010.1063/1.3462985 ↗
16. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2011 · 257 · 513810.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.076 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 10351510.1063/1.3388591 ↗
18. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2011 · 1365 · 9610.1063/1.3625313 ↗
19. New J. Phys. · 2011 · 13 · 10302610.1088/1367-2630/13/10/103026 ↗
20. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3698119 for the simulation code, and a further example of beam propagation.