journal article·2015-07-01Open access

Size-dependent deformation mechanisms in hollow silicon nanoparticles

L. Yang, J. J. Bian, H. Zhang, X. R. Niu, G. F. Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 7

Abstract

Even inherently brittle hollow silicon nanoparticles (NPs) can withstand larger strain to failure than solid NPs. However, the influence of wall thickness on the mechanical behavior of hollow Si NPs is not fully understood. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we investigate the compressive behavior of hollow Si NPs. Three distinct failure mechanisms of hollow NPs are uncovered, and their strength and deformability are analyzed quantitatively. For extra-thick-walled NPs, dislocations will nucleate below the contact area and cut through the particles till failure. For mid-thick-walled NPs, however, dislocations will emit from the inner surface and slip towards the outer surface. For thin-walled NPs, elastic buckling is the cause of failure. Compared to solid NPs, hollow NPs with wall thickness being around half of its outer radius can achieve significant improvement in both strength and deformability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 Department of Engineering Mechanics, SVL, , Xi’an 710049, China

University of Alberta 2 Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, , Edmonton T6G 2V4, Canada

City University of Hong Kong 3 CASM and Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, , Hong Kong SAR, China

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Phys. D · 2014 · 47 · 1300110.1088/0022-3727/47/1/013001 ↗
2. Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 84710.1021/nl4001053 ↗
3. Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 520210.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.057 ↗
4. Nature Nanotech. · 2011 · 6 · 48010.1038/nnano.2011.118 ↗
5. J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2003 · 51 · 97910.1016/S0022-5096(03)00018-8 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 17570110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.175701 ↗
7. Comp. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 50 · 165110.1016/j.commatsci.2010.12.023 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 06353410.1063/1.3552985 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 1985 · 31 · 526210.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 05410910.1103/PhysRevB.70.054109 ↗
11. Comp. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 54 · 28010.1016/j.commatsci.2011.11.004 ↗
12. Nature Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 94710.1038/nmat2295 ↗
13. Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 294910.1021/nl201470j ↗
14. Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 1049210.1021/la2018117 ↗
15. SMALL · 2010 · 6 · 188610.1002/smll.201000575 ↗
16. J. Comp. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 16550710.1103/PhysRevLett.87.165507 ↗
19. Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 18 · 01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
20. J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2004 · 52 · 69110.1016/j.jmps.2003.07.006 ↗
21. 1985
22. J. Appl. Mech. · 1970 · 37 · 63510.1115/1.3408592 ↗
23. Philos. Mag. · 2007 · 87 · 2910.1080/14786430600876585 ↗