The effects of numerical acceleration techniques on PIC-MCC simulations of ion thrusters
Source abstract
Abstract
The particle-in-cell-Monte Carlo collision method has been widely used in simulation studies of ion thrusters. Due to the huge computational demand of such simulations, numerical acceleration techniques are required. However, the effects of such numerical acceleration techniques on the simulation results are not clear. In this study, the effects of three numerical acceleration techniques are investigated using a series of simulations that implement different numerical acceleration factors. The resulting plasma potentials, plasma density distributions, and plasma currents in the discharge chamber are compared for simulations accelerated by increasing the vacuum permittivity, reducing the mass of heavy particles, and making use of self-similarity. The results demonstrate that increasing the permittivity thickens the sheath. When the sheath expands enough to extend to the cusps, the distributions of the potentials and the plasma densities are affected, influencing the current parameters. Reducing the masses of heavy particles greatly influences ion properties, especially the plasma density. Thus, it causes significant errors in the potential and current parameters. Errors in the beam current can be significantly decreased by correcting the beam current using an exponent relationship between the mass scaling factor and the plasma density. The use of self-similarity simultaneously thickens the sheath and decreases the particle number density and may slightly reduce the plasma current values. A number of suggestions for employing these techniques are also provided.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasma Diagnostics and Applications · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Astronautics, Beihang University 1 , Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
Key Laboratory of Spacecraft Design Optimization and Dynamic Simulation Technologies of Ministry of Education, Beihang University 2 , Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University 3 , Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
School of Space and Environment, Beihang University 4 , Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Plasmas · 2003 · 10 · 413710.1063/1.1611881 ↗
2. 2008
3. Phys. Plasmas · 2011 · 18 · 03350110.1063/1.3551583 ↗
4. Development of grid-based direct kinetic method and hybrid kinetic-continuum modeling of Hall thruster discharge plasmas
5. 2019
6. 1991
7. 1988
8. Fully kinetic numerical modeling of a plasma thruster
9. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 51 · 03520110.1088/1361-6463/aa9e3e ↗
10. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2004 · 164 · 16010.1016/j.cpc.2004.06.025 ↗
11. Phys. Plasmas · 2005 · 12 · 04350210.1063/1.1862630 ↗
12. Phys. Plasmas · 2005 · 12 · 05350210.1063/1.1877517 ↗
13. 1969
14. 2005
15. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 06350110.1063/1.4810798 ↗
16. J. Propul. Power · 2014 · 30 · 19710.2514/1.b34774 ↗
17. S. Kay Ueda, “PIC simulation of SPT Hall thrusters: High power operation and wall effects,” M.Sc. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.
18. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 49 · 46500110.1088/0022-3727/49/46/465001 ↗
19. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 33520110.1088/1361-6463/aa7bbf ↗
20. Vacuum · 2017 · 143 · 25110.1016/j.vacuum.2017.06.030 ↗
21. J. Propul. Power · 2010 · 26 · 67310.2514/1.45954 ↗
22. 2008
23. 2010
24. 2011
25. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 10350210.1063/1.4824619 ↗
26. 2015
27. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 28 · 03400410.1088/1361-6595/ab0949 ↗
28. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 354110.1063/1.368529 ↗
29. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2000 · 9 · 21910.1088/0963-0252/9/2/316 ↗
30. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 559210.1063/1.1465125 ↗
31. 2006
32. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 01330310.1063/1.3055399 ↗
33. Phys. Plasmas · 2012 · 19 · 11350810.1063/1.4768430 ↗
34. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 10351210.1063/1.5029945 ↗
35. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 52 · 28520210.1088/1361-6463/ab197e ↗
36. Plasma structure and behavior of miniature ring-cusp discharges
37. J. Propuls. Power · 2014 · 30 · 62810.2514/1.b34759 ↗
38. 1970 · 3
39. 2016
40. J. Comput. Phys. · 1992 · 101 · 1110.1016/0021-9991(92)90039-2 ↗
41. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 1995 · 87 · 17910.1016/0010-4655(94)00171-w ↗
42. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 16520210.1088/0022-3727/43/16/165202 ↗
43. The use of electrostatic probes to characterize the discharge plasma structure and identify discharge cathode erosion mechanisms in ring-cusp ion thrusters
44. J. Appl. Phys. · 1961 · 32 · 251210.1063/1.1728342 ↗
45. Y. Jiang, “Theoretical and experimental studies on a low-power cylindrical Hall Thruster,” M.Sc. thesis, The Beihang University, 2018.
46. Performance and life time simulation of ion thruster optics
47. AIAA J. · 1985 · 23 · 173110.2514/3.9158 ↗
48. 2015
49. 2008
50. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 15550110.1088/0022-3727/47/15/155501 ↗
51. J. Spacecr. Rockets · 2015 · 52 · 118110.2514/1.a33049 ↗