Molecular dynamics simulations of ejecta production from sinusoidal tin surfaces under supported and unsupported shocks
Source abstract
Abstract
Micro-ejecta, an instability growth process, occurs at metal/vacuum or metal/gas interface when compressed shock wave releases from the free surface that contains surface defects. We present molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the ejecta production from tin surface shocked by supported and unsupported waves with pressures ranging from 8.5 to 60.8 GPa. It is found that the loading waveforms have little effect on spike velocity while remarkably affect the bubble velocity. The bubble velocity of unsupported shock loading remains nonzero constant value at late time as observed in experiments. Besides, the time evolution of ejected mass in the simulations is compared with the recently developed ejecta source model, indicating the suppressed ejection of unmelted or partial melted materials. Moreover, different reference positions are chosen to characterize the amount of ejecta under different loading waveforms. Compared with supported shock case, the ejected mass of unsupported shock case saturates at lower pressure. Through the analysis on unloading path, we find that the temperature of tin sample increases quickly from tensile stress state to zero pressure state, resulting in the melting of bulk tin under decaying shock. Thus, the unsupported wave loading exhibits a lower threshold pressure causing the solid-liquid phase transition on shock release than the supported shock loading.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China 1 , Hefei, Anhui 230027, China
Laboratory of Computational Physics, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics 2 , Beijing 100094, China
Funding
Science Challenge Project · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 1953 · 24 · 34910.1063/1.1721278 ↗
2. 1998 · 61
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1976 · 29 · 28410.1063/1.89066 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 11350810.1063/1.2132521 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 01352210.1063/1.2752130 ↗
6. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2009 · 1195 · 104710.1063/1.3294980 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 12350210.1063/1.2939253 ↗
8. J. Fluid Mech. · 2012 · 703 · 6010.1017/jfm.2012.190 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 50810.1103/physrevlett.80.508 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 123 · 02590210.1063/1.5008495 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 02490510.1063/1.4773575 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 118 · 18590110.1063/1.4934645 ↗
13. J. Dyn. Behavior Mater. · 2017 · 3 · 31610.1007/s40870-017-0116-4 ↗
14. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2012 · 1426 · 99510.1063/1.3686445 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 26450210.1103/physrevlett.107.264502 ↗
16. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 1083310.1088/0953-8984/14/44/386 ↗
17. 2009 · 1499
18. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2012 · 1426 · 130710.1063/1.3686521 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 16590310.1063/1.4918537 ↗
20. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2013 · 21 · 05500510.1088/0965-0393/21/5/055005 ↗
21. J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 139 · 16470410.1063/1.4825400 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 07350410.1063/1.4865798 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 21350610.1063/1.4903732 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 15350110.1063/1.4801800 ↗
25. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2017 · 25 · 01501110.1088/1361-651x/25/1/015011 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 04490110.1063/1.3684978 ↗
27. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 19490210.1063/1.4832758 ↗
28. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 98 · 27110.1016/j.commatsci.2014.11.020 ↗
29. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2015 · 653 · 01204310.1088/1742-6596/653/1/012043 ↗
30. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2017 · 1793 · 10002410.1063/1.4971649 ↗
31. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 01350610.1063/1.2400800 ↗
32. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 04352510.1063/1.4863719 ↗
33. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 10351810.1063/1.2128493 ↗
34. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 07350110.1063/1.4891733 ↗
35. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 13350710.1063/1.4896902 ↗
36. Chin. Phys. B · 2016 · 25 · 08620210.1088/1674-1056/25/8/086202 ↗
37. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
38. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2014 · 500 · 03201710.1088/1742-6596/500/3/032017 ↗
39. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2012 · 20 · 04502110.1088/0965-0393/20/4/045021 ↗
40. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 18 · 01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
41. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 290010.1103/physrevlett.82.2900 ↗
42. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 122 · 13510710.1063/1.4994789 ↗
43. J. R. Asay and L. D. Bertholf, “A model for estimating the effects of surface roughness on mass ejection from shocked materials,” Sandia National Laboratory Technical Report No. SAND-78-1256, 1978.10.2172/6793637 ↗
44. J. Dyn. Behavior Mater. · 2017 · 3 · 48510.1007/s40870-017-0127-1 ↗
45. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 02410310.1103/physrevb.77.024103 ↗
46. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 14431210.1063/1.4799388 ↗