journal article·2020-07-15Open access

High-Contrast Switching of Plasmonic Structural Colors: Inorganic versus Organic Electrochromism

Marika Gugole, Oliver Olsson, Kunli Xiong, Jolie C. Blake, José Montero Amenedo, Ilknur Bayrak Pehlivan, Gunnar A. Niklasson, Andreas Dahlin

ACS Photonics· Volume 7· Issue 7

Abstract

Plasmonic structural colors have recently received a lot of attention. For many applications there is a need to actively tune the colors after preparing the nanostructures, preferably with as strong changes in the optical response as possible. However, to date, there is a lack of systematic investigations on how to enhance contrast in electrically induced color modulation. In this work we implement electrochromic films with plasmonic metasurfaces and compare systematically organic and inorganic materials, with the primary aim to maximize brightness and contrast in a reflective color display. We show nanostructures with good chromaticity and high polarization-insensitive reflectivity (-90%) that are electrochemically stable in a nonaqueous solvent. Methods are evaluated for reliable and uniform electropolymerization of the conductive polymer dimethylpropylenedioxythiophene (PProDOTMe2) on gold. The resulting organic films are well-described by Lambert-Beer formalism, and the highest achievable contrast is easily determined in transmission mode. The optical properties of the inorganic option (WO3) require full Fresnel models due to thin film interference, and the film thickness must be carefully selected in order to maintain the chromaticity of the metasurfaces. Still, the optimized fully inorganic device reaches the highest contrast of approximately 60% reflectivity change for all primary colors. The switching time is about an order of magnitude faster for the organic films (hundreds of ms). The bistability is very long (hours) for the inorganic devices and comparable for the polymers, which makes the power consumption essentially zero for maintaining the same state. Finally, we show that switching of the primary colors in optimized devices (both organic and inorganic) provides almost twice as high brightness and contrast compared to existing reflective display technologies with RGB subpixels created by color filters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 534, SE-75121 Uppsala, Sweden

Funding

Stiftelsen f?r?Strategisk Forskning

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.8810.1038/natrevmats.2016.88 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0321559910.1007/BF03215599 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20160335810.1002/adma.201603358 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0314310.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03143 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0014710.1021/acsanm.9b00147 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-019-14194-y10.1038/s41467-019-14194-y ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0508810.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05088 ↗
8. 10.1002/adom.20180117910.1002/adom.201801179 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20170433810.1002/adma.201704338 ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-6633/aaf84410.1088/1361-6633/aaf844 ↗
11. 10.1038/ncomms1520910.1038/ncomms15209 ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms1047910.1038/ncomms10479 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0060710.1021/acsphotonics.6b00607 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20130590510.1002/adma.201305905 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja054915v10.1021/ja054915v ↗
16. Deb, S. K. In Some aspects of electrochromic display systems, Proc. 24th Electronic Components Conf. IEEE, 1974; pp 11–14.
17. 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.05.00910.1016/j.solmat.2009.05.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.00210.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.002 ↗
19. 10.1039/C6TC03542F10.1039/C6TC03542F ↗
20. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.03.01810.1016/j.solmat.2015.03.018 ↗
21. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199911)11:16<1379::AID-ADMA1379>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199911)11:16<1379::AID-ADMA1379>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
22. 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.05.00410.1016/j.elecom.2007.05.004 ↗
23. 10.1889/JSID19.2.12910.1889/JSID19.2.129 ↗
24. 10.1038/nature0198810.1038/nature01988 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0229210.1021/acsnano.8b02292 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.12.00710.1016/j.orgel.2011.12.007 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0366510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03665 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-019-14047-810.1038/s41467-019-14047-8 ↗
29. 10.1021/nn304662e10.1021/nn304662e ↗
30. 10.1063/1.492648810.1063/1.4926488 ↗
31. 10.1039/c2nr11950a10.1039/c2nr11950a ↗
32. 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.11.01410.1016/j.solmat.2005.11.014 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20040135310.1002/adma.200401353 ↗
34. 10.1021/cm049951s10.1021/cm049951s ↗
35. 10.1039/b417607c10.1039/b417607c ↗
36. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.07910.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.079 ↗
37. 10.3390/su7081085410.3390/su70810854 ↗
38. 10.1038/nmat436810.1038/nmat4368 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41467-019-09054-810.1038/s41467-019-09054-8 ↗
40. 10.1039/C5SC03727A10.1039/C5SC03727A ↗