Interplay of uniaxial and cubic anisotropy in epitaxial Fe thin films on MgO (001) substrate
Source abstract
Abstract
Epitaxial Fe thin films were grown on annealed MgO(001) substrates at oblique incidence by DC magnetron sputtering. Due to the oblique growth configuration, uniaxial anisotropy was found to be superimposed on the expected four-fold cubic anisotropy. A detailed study of in-plane magnetic hysteresis for Fe on MgO thin films has been performed by Magneto Optic Kerr Effect (MOKE) magnetometer. Both single step and double step loops have been observed depending on the angle between the applied field and easy axis i.e. along ⟨100⟩ direction. Domain images during magnetization reversal were captured by Kerr microscope. Domain images clearly evidence two successive and separate 90° domain wall (DW) nucleation and motion along cubic easy cum uniaxial easy axis and cubic easy cum uniaxial hard axis, respectively. However, along cubic hard axis two 180° domain wall motion dominate the magnetization reversal process. In spite of having four-fold anisotropy it is essential to explain magnetization reversal mechanism in 0°< ϕ < 90° span as uniaxial anisotropy plays a major role in this system. Also it is shown that substrate rotation can suppress the effect of uniaxial anisotropy superimposed on four-fold anisotropy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic Properties of Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER) School of Physical Sciences, , Institute of Physics (IOP) Campus, Bhubaneswar – 751005, India
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 09392010.1063/1.3662179 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 42 · 543310.1103/PhysRevB.42.5433 ↗
3. J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1980 · 57 · 3043
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 11720310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.117203 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 09250210.1063/1.2778466 ↗
6. Europhys. Lett. · 2006 · 75 · 11910.1209/epl/i2006-10089-5 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 04610310.1103/PhysRevLett.98.046103 ↗
8. Phys. Rev.Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 17660110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.176601 ↗
9. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1960 · 15 · 93610.1143/JPSJ.15.936 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 19330110.1103/PhysRevB.63.193301 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 13720210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.137202 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 78 · 721010.1063/1.360431 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 401810.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4018 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 09441610.1103/PhysRevB.80.094416 ↗
15. Japan. J. Appl. Phys. · 1993 · 32 · L113710.1143/JJAP.32.L1137 ↗
16. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4895803 for anisotropy symmetries, high resolution domain images along ϕ = 0°, and transverse hysteresis loops of the system.
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 12251010.1063/1.2789396 ↗
18. New Journal of Physics · 2009 · 11 · 06300310.1088/1367-2630/11/6/063003 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 12391810.1063/1.4730632 ↗
20. AIP Advances · 2014 · 4 · 210.1063/1.4865248 ↗
21. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2000 · 210 · 30910.1016/S0304-8853(99)00761-1 ↗
22. Science · 1998 · 282 · 539410.1126/science.282.5394.1660 ↗