journal article·2014-06-01Open access

Correlating electroluminescence characterization and physics-based models of InGaN/GaN LEDs: Pitfalls and open issues

Marco Calciati, Michele Goano, Francesco Bertazzi, Marco Vallone, Xiangyu Zhou, Giovanni Ghione, Matteo Meneghini, Gaudenzio Meneghesso, Enrico Zanoni, Enrico Bellotti, Giovanni Verzellesi, Dandan Zhu, Colin Humphreys

AIP Advances· Volume 4· Issue 6

Abstract

Electroluminescence (EL) characterization of InGaN/GaN light-emitting diodes (LEDs), coupled with numerical device models of different sophistication, is routinely adopted not only to establish correlations between device efficiency and structural features, but also to make inferences about the loss mechanisms responsible for LED efficiency droop at high driving currents. The limits of this investigative approach are discussed here in a case study based on a comprehensive set of current- and temperature-dependent EL data from blue LEDs with low and high densities of threading dislocations (TDs). First, the effects limiting the applicability of simpler (closed-form and/or one-dimensional) classes of models are addressed, like lateral current crowding, vertical carrier distribution nonuniformity, and interband transition broadening. Then, the major sources of uncertainty affecting state-of-the-art numerical device simulation are reviewed and discussed, including (i) the approximations in the transport description through the multi-quantum-well active region, (ii) the alternative valence band parametrizations proposed to calculate the spontaneous emission rate, (iii) the difficulties in defining the Auger coefficients due to inadequacies in the microscopic quantum well description and the possible presence of extra, non-Auger high-current-density recombination mechanisms and/or Auger-induced leakage. In the case of the present LED structures, the application of three-dimensional numerical-simulation-based analysis to the EL data leads to an explanation of efficiency droop in terms of TD-related and Auger-like nonradiative losses, with a C coefficient in the 10−30 cm6/s range at room temperature, close to the larger theoretical calculations reported so far. However, a study of the combined effects of structural and model uncertainties suggests that the C values thus determined could be overestimated by about an order of magnitude. This preliminary attempt at uncertainty quantification confirms, beyond the present case, the need for an improved description of carrier transport and microscopic radiative and nonradiative recombination mechanisms in device-level LED numerical models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · ZnO doping and properties · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Politecnico di Torino 1 Dipartimento di Elettronica e Telecomunicazioni, , corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Politecnico di Torino 2 IEIIT-CNR, , corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Università di Padova 3 Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, , Via Gradenigo 6/B, 35131 Padova, Italy

Boston University 4 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, , 8 Saint Mary's Street, 02215 Boston, MA, USA

Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia 5 Dipartimento di Scienze e Metodi dell'Ingegneria, , 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy

University of Cambridge 6 Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, , 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom

Funding

U.S. Army Research Laboratory

References (98)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. · 2009 · 15 · 102810.1109/JSTQE.2009.2013476 ↗
2. Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) · 2009 · 6 · S91310.1002/pssc.200880950 ↗
3. Proc. IEEE · 2010 · 98 · 118010.1109/JPROC.2010.2043210 ↗
4. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) · 2010 · 207 · 221710.1002/pssa.201026149 ↗
5. Laser & Photon. Rev. · 2013 · 7 · 40810.1002/lpor.201200025 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 07110110.1063/1.4816434 ↗
7. Piprek · 2005 · 29310.1007/0-387-27256-9_10 ↗
8. Piprek · 2007 · 30310.1002/9783527610723 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 13350210.1063/1.3367897 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 06451110.1063/1.3642955 ↗
11. Semiconductor Sci. Tech. · 2010 · 54 · 1119
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 07191010.1063/1.3685717 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 03311210.1063/1.3460271 ↗
14. Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) · 2011 · 8 · 226410.1002/pssc.201000891 ↗
15. Semiconductor Sci. Tech. · 2011 · 26 · 01402210.1088/0268-1242/26/1/014022 ↗
16. Opt. Quantum Electron. · 2013 · 45 · 59710.1007/s11082-012-9647-z ↗
17. Phys. Stat. Sol. RRL · 2012 · 6 · 41810.1002/pssr.201206367 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 11371210.1063/1.4768707 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 04371510.1063/1.4816254 ↗
20. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2012 · 48 · 50010.1109/JQE.2012.2186610 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 21410310.1103/PhysRevB.88.214103 ↗
22. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2000 · 36 · 35410.1109/3.825883 ↗
23. Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 2181810.1364/OE.19.021818 ↗
24. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2012 · 59 · 140210.1109/TED.2012.2186579 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6 · 05210510.7567/APEX.6.052105 ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 18112710.1063/1.3658031 ↗
27. 2006 · 61151T10.1117/12.641744 ↗
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 10350410.1063/1.3330870 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 22110610.1063/1.3446889 ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 13350710.1063/1.3493654 ↗
31. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 16110610.1063/1.4704366 ↗
32. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 24110410.1063/1.4770317 ↗
33. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 25210310.1063/1.4772549 ↗
34. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 419110.1063/1.1403665 ↗
35. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2001 · 48 · 106510.1109/16.925227 ↗
36. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 25111010.1063/1.3529470 ↗
37. Semiconductor Sci. Tech. · 2011 · 26 · 09500710.1088/0268-1242/26/9/095007 ↗
38. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) · 2012 · 209 · 263010.1002/pssa.201228473 ↗
39. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. · 2012 · 24 · 112410.1109/LPT.2012.2196426 ↗
40. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 01450210.1063/1.4772669 ↗
41. Semiconductor Sci. Tech. · 2012 · 27 · 05501310.1088/0268-1242/27/5/055013 ↗
42. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2012 · 59 · 40010.1109/TED.2011.2176132 ↗
43. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2013 · 34 · 27710.1109/LED.2012.2228841 ↗
44. Opt. Quantum Electron. · 2010 · 42 · 8910.1007/s11082-011-9437-z ↗
45. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 13110910.1063/1.3698113 ↗
46. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2010 · 57 · 6010.1109/TED.2009.2034792 ↗
47. Japan. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 52 · 08JG0910.7567/JJAP.52.08JG09 ↗
48. 2004 · 12710.1117/12.543266 ↗
53. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 18310410.1063/1.4804415 ↗
54. J. Comp. Phys. · 2006 · 213 · 21410.1016/j.jcp.2005.08.011 ↗
55. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 23111410.1063/1.2822442 ↗
56. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106 · 11450810.1063/1.3266014 ↗
57. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 20110810.1063/1.3266520 ↗
58. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2010 · 57 · 7910.1109/TED.2009.2035538 ↗
59. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 04111210.1063/1.3618673 ↗
60. Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · A99110.1364/OE.19.00A991 ↗
61. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) · 2011 · 208 · 94710.1002/pssa.201026668 ↗
62. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 09310610.1063/1.3585872 ↗
63. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 03110610.1063/1.3614557 ↗
64. Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) · 2013 · 250 · 28310.1002/pssb.201248286 ↗
65. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 01111110.1063/1.4733353 ↗
66. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 08110610.1063/1.4819129 ↗
67. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 472110.1063/1.1527225 ↗
68. Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) · 2011 · 8 · 217010.1002/pssc.201001051 ↗
69. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 11353710.1063/1.3596592 ↗
70. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 16210210.1063/1.4759003 ↗
71. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 25211010.1063/1.4772548 ↗
72. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 10311510.1063/1.4720447 ↗
73. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 01111510.1063/1.4773588 ↗
74. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 14450210.1063/1.4824065 ↗
75. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 03112010.1063/1.4789364 ↗
76. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 14110110.1063/1.2785135 ↗
77. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 03350110.1063/1.3462916 ↗
78. Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) · 2011 · 8 · 215110.1002/pssc.201000956 ↗
79. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 04310310.1063/1.3549160 ↗
80. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 01310210.1063/1.4772683 ↗
81. IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. · 2003 · 9 · 68810.1109/JSTQE.2003.818342 ↗
82. Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) · 2011 · 8 · 227310.1002/pssc.201001048 ↗
83. Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) · 2011 · 8 · 228210.1002/pssc.201001050 ↗
84. Phys. Rev. A · 1989 · 39 · 188710.1103/PhysRevA.39.1887 ↗
85. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 67 · 75410.1063/1.115215 ↗
86. Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 1997 · 50 · 17410.1016/S0921-5107(97)00158-X ↗
87. 1999
88. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 04110910.1063/1.3075853 ↗
89. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) · 2011 · 208 · 19510.1002/pssa.201026420 ↗
90. 2013 · 86251M10.1117/12.2005134 ↗
91. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2001 · ED-48 · 53510.1109/16.906448 ↗
92. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 12370610.1063/1.2748353 ↗
93. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106 · 06371810.1063/1.3213363 ↗
94. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 320410.1109/TED.2013.2266577 ↗
95. Solid-State Electron. · 2005 · 49 · 167810.1016/j.sse.2005.09.002 ↗
96. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1989 · 36 · 60910.1109/16.22464 ↗
97. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 09310910.1063/1.3660207 ↗
98. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1998 · 34 · 12010.1109/3.655016 ↗