High performance metamaterial device with enhanced electromagnetic energy harvesting efficiency
Source abstract
Abstract
A high performance metamaterial device for electromagnetic energy harvesting is presented. The unit cell of the metamaterial device consists of four identical omega ring resonators arranged in rotational symmetry, and each omega ring is loaded with a 50 Ω resistor that mimics the input impedance of a rectifier circuit. A proof-of-concept prototype is designed for operation at the frequency of 5.8 GHz. Here, the efficient energy harvesting is validated by the energy dissipated in each resistor. Based on the full absorption concept, the metamaterial device achieves a harvesting efficiency up to 93.1% under normal incidence. In addition, the energy harvester shows polarization independent and wide-angle incident frequency responses with good harvesting characteristics over the entire operating range. The surface current distribution is analyzed to gain an insight into the energy harvesting mechanism. Moreover, the harvester prototype is manufactured and measured, and the simulated and measured results are in good agreement. Due to the enhanced electromagnetic energy harvesting efficiency, the proposed device is a good candidate for microwave power transmission.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Antenna Design and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center of Tracking, Telemetering and Command and Communication, Chongqing University 1 , Chongqing 400044, China
State Key Laboratory of Vehicle NVH and Safety Technology 2 , Chongqing 401120, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Chongqing Science and Technology Commission
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Proc. IEEE · 2014 · 102 · 169210.1109/jproc.2014.2355261 ↗
2. Proc. IEEE · 2014 · 102 · 166710.1109/jproc.2014.2358691 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 17390310.1063/1.4764054 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 418410.1103/physrevlett.84.4184 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 396610.1103/physrevlett.85.3966 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 09111410.1063/1.2037202 ↗
7. Science · 2006 · 314 · 97710.1126/science.1133628 ↗
8. Nat. Commun. · 2010 · 1 · 2110.1038/ncomms1023 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 20740210.1103/physrevlett.100.207402 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 24110310.1103/physrevb.78.241103 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 15390210.1063/1.4916232 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 03390210.1063/1.4927238 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 16390310.1063/1.4873587 ↗
14. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. · 2006 · 54 · 149510.1109/tmtt.2006.871362 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 11410110.1063/1.3637045 ↗
16. Opt. Eng. · 2015 · 54 · 09710210.1117/1.oe.54.9.097102 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 20510410.1103/physrevb.86.205104 ↗
18. Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 867010.1364/oe.23.008670 ↗