Effects of the inlet conditions and blood models on accurate prediction of hemodynamics in the stented coronary arteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Hemodynamics altered by stent implantation is well-known to be closely related to in-stent restenosis. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method has been used to investigate the hemodynamics in stented arteries in detail and help to analyze the performances of stents. In this study, blood models with Newtonian or non-Newtonian properties were numerically investigated for the hemodynamics at steady or pulsatile inlet conditions respectively employing CFD based on the finite volume method. The results showed that the blood model with non-Newtonian property decreased the area of low wall shear stress (WSS) compared with the blood model with Newtonian property and the magnitude of WSS varied with the magnitude and waveform of the inlet velocity. The study indicates that the inlet conditions and blood models are all important for accurately predicting the hemodynamics. This will be beneficial to estimate the performances of stents and also help clinicians to select the proper stents for the patients.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 School of Mechanical Engineering, , Xi’an, 710049, People’s Republic of China
State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering 2 , Room 405 West Building5, 99# Yanxiang Road, Yanta District, 710054, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. · 1971 · 177 · 10910.1098/rspb.1971.0019 ↗
2. J. Biomech. · 2003 · 36 · 68110.1016/S0021-9290(02)00446-3 ↗
3. Atherosclerosis · 1994 · 110 · 22510.1016/0021-9150(94)90207-0 ↗
4. J. Biomech. Eng.- T. ASME · 1996 · 118 · 7410.1115/1.2795948 ↗
5. Circulation · 2002 · 105 · E18510.1161/01.CIR.0000018282.32332.13 ↗
6. J. Appl. Physiol. · 2005 · 98 · 94710.1152/japplphysiol.00872.2004 ↗
7. Circulation · 2003 · 107 · 274110.1161/01.CIR.0000066914.95878.6D ↗
8. Ann. Biomed. Eng. · 2003 · 31 · 97210.1114/1.1588654 ↗
9. J. Biomech. · 2003 · 36 · 99110.1016/S0021-9290(03)00068-X ↗
10. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. · 2007 · 39 · 35710.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110300 ↗
11. J. Biomech. · 1999 · 32 · 60110.1016/S0021-9290(99)00015-9 ↗
12. J. Biomech. · 1999 · 32 · 70510.1016/S0021-9290(99)00014-7 ↗
13. J. Biomech. · 2004 · 37 · 70910.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.016 ↗
14. J. Biomech. · 2006 · 39 · 111610.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.034 ↗
15. J. Biomech. · 2006 · 39 · 81810.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.003 ↗
16. Biorheology · 2005 · 42 · 493
17. 1980
18. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. · 2000 · 32 · 34710.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.347 ↗
19. Biorheology · 1991 · 28 · 24110.3233/BIR-1991-283-415 ↗
20. J. Appl. Physiol. · 1966 · 21 · 8110.1152/jappl.1966.21.1.81 ↗
21. Biorheology · 2005 · 42 · 137
22. J. Biomech. · 2006 · 39 · 206410.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.06.023 ↗
23. J. Fluid. Eng.-T. ASME · 2001 · 123 · 86910.1115/1.1400748 ↗
24. J. Mater. Process. Tech. · 2008 · 197 · 17410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.010 ↗
25. J. Biomech. · 2008 · 41 · 105310.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.005 ↗
26. Biorheology · 1989 · 26 · 101110.3233/BIR-1989-26605 ↗