journal article·2015-05-01Open access

Effects of the inlet conditions and blood models on accurate prediction of hemodynamics in the stented coronary arteries

Yongfei Jiang, Jun Zhang, Wanhua Zhao

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 5

Abstract

Hemodynamics altered by stent implantation is well-known to be closely related to in-stent restenosis. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method has been used to investigate the hemodynamics in stented arteries in detail and help to analyze the performances of stents. In this study, blood models with Newtonian or non-Newtonian properties were numerically investigated for the hemodynamics at steady or pulsatile inlet conditions respectively employing CFD based on the finite volume method. The results showed that the blood model with non-Newtonian property decreased the area of low wall shear stress (WSS) compared with the blood model with Newtonian property and the magnitude of WSS varied with the magnitude and waveform of the inlet velocity. The study indicates that the inlet conditions and blood models are all important for accurately predicting the hemodynamics. This will be beneficial to estimate the performances of stents and also help clinicians to select the proper stents for the patients.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 School of Mechanical Engineering, , Xi’an, 710049, People’s Republic of China

State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering 2 , Room 405 West Building5, 99# Yanxiang Road, Yanta District, 710054, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. · 1971 · 177 · 10910.1098/rspb.1971.0019 ↗
2. J. Biomech. · 2003 · 36 · 68110.1016/S0021-9290(02)00446-3 ↗
3. Atherosclerosis · 1994 · 110 · 22510.1016/0021-9150(94)90207-0 ↗
4. J. Biomech. Eng.- T. ASME · 1996 · 118 · 7410.1115/1.2795948 ↗
5. Circulation · 2002 · 105 · E18510.1161/01.CIR.0000018282.32332.13 ↗
6. J. Appl. Physiol. · 2005 · 98 · 94710.1152/japplphysiol.00872.2004 ↗
7. Circulation · 2003 · 107 · 274110.1161/01.CIR.0000066914.95878.6D ↗
8. Ann. Biomed. Eng. · 2003 · 31 · 97210.1114/1.1588654 ↗
9. J. Biomech. · 2003 · 36 · 99110.1016/S0021-9290(03)00068-X ↗
10. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. · 2007 · 39 · 35710.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110300 ↗
11. J. Biomech. · 1999 · 32 · 60110.1016/S0021-9290(99)00015-9 ↗
12. J. Biomech. · 1999 · 32 · 70510.1016/S0021-9290(99)00014-7 ↗
13. J. Biomech. · 2004 · 37 · 70910.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.016 ↗
14. J. Biomech. · 2006 · 39 · 111610.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.034 ↗
15. J. Biomech. · 2006 · 39 · 81810.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.003 ↗
16. Biorheology · 2005 · 42 · 493
17. 1980
18. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. · 2000 · 32 · 34710.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.347 ↗
19. Biorheology · 1991 · 28 · 24110.3233/BIR-1991-283-415 ↗
20. J. Appl. Physiol. · 1966 · 21 · 8110.1152/jappl.1966.21.1.81 ↗
21. Biorheology · 2005 · 42 · 137
22. J. Biomech. · 2006 · 39 · 206410.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.06.023 ↗
23. J. Fluid. Eng.-T. ASME · 2001 · 123 · 86910.1115/1.1400748 ↗
24. J. Mater. Process. Tech. · 2008 · 197 · 17410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.010 ↗
25. J. Biomech. · 2008 · 41 · 105310.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.005 ↗
26. Biorheology · 1989 · 26 · 101110.3233/BIR-1989-26605 ↗