Analysis of low efficiency droop of semipolar InGaN quantum well light-emitting diodes by modified rate equation with weak phase-space filling effect
Source abstract
Abstract
We study the low efficiency droop characteristics of semipolar InGaN light-emitting diodes (LEDs) using modified rate equation incoporating the phase-space filling (PSF) effect where the results on c-plane LEDs are also obtained and compared. Internal quantum efficiency (IQE) of LEDs was simulated using a modified ABC model with different PSF filling (n0), Shockley-Read-Hall (A), radiative (B), Auger (C) coefficients and different active layer thickness (d), where the PSF effect showed a strong impact on the simulated LED efficiency results. A weaker PSF effect was found for low-droop semipolar LEDs possibly due to small quantum confined Stark effect, short carrier lifetime, and small average carrier density. A very good agreement between experimental data and the theoretical modeling was obtained for low-droop semipolar LEDs with weak PSF effect. These results suggest the low droop performance may be explained by different mechanisms for semipolar LEDs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Arizona State University School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, , Tempe, AZ 85287, U.S.A.
Funding
Bisgrove Scholar program from Science Foundation Arizona
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 18350710.1063/1.2800290 ↗
2. Electron. Lett. · 2015 · 51 · 118710.1049/el.2015.1647 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 16110710.1063/1.3570656 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 14110110.1063/1.2785135 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 884910.1103/PhysRevB.60.8849 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 17740610.1103/PhysRevLett.110.177406 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 23111810.1063/1.3525605 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 26110310.1063/1.2953543 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 16110710.1063/1.3570656 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 13110910.1063/1.3698113 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 16110610.1063/1.4704366 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Express · 2012 · 5 · 06210310.1143/APEX.5.062103 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Express · 2011 · 4 · 08210410.1143/APEX.4.082104 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 17110610.1063/1.4900793 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 119 · 17450210.1063/1.4948667 ↗
17. Nature (London) · 2000 · 406 · 86510.1038/35022529 ↗
18. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 49 · 07020610.1143/JJAP.49.070206 ↗
19. Opt. Express · 2016 · 24 · A85610.1364/OE.24.00A856 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 10350410.1063/1.3330870 ↗
21. Proc. IEEE · 2013 · 101 · 221110.1109/JPROC.2013.2274929 ↗
22. New J. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 12500610.1088/1367-2630/15/12/125006 ↗
23. Proc. SPIE · 2006 · 6115 · 61151T10.1117/12.641744 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 23110710.1063/1.4769374 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6 · 06210210.7567/APEX.6.062102 ↗
26. J. Disp. Technol. · 2013 · 9 · 19010.1109/JDT.2012.2227682 ↗
27. J. Disp. Technol. · 2015
28. Appl. Phys. Express · 2010 · 3 · 02100210.1143/APEX.3.021002 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 17112310.1063/1.2734498 ↗
30. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2011 · 17 · 139010.1109/JSTQE.2011.2116770 ↗
31. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 990410.1063/1.1480465 ↗
32. Appl. Phys. Express · 2010 · 3 · 02100210.1143/APEX.3.021002 ↗
33. Phys. Stat. Sol. A · 2009 · 206 · 20010.1002/pssa.200880411 ↗
34. J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 35400210.1088/0022-3727/43/35/354002 ↗