Comparison on the coercivity enhancement of sintered NdFeB magnets by grain boundary diffusion with low-melting (Tb, R)75Cu25 alloys (R= None, Y, La, and Ce)
Source abstract
Abstract
A significant coercivity enhancement of the commercial NdFeB magnets with the magnetic properties of (BH)max = 48.4 MGOe and iHc = 17.5 kOe through grain boundary diffusion (GBD) with low-melting Tb55R20Cu25 alloys is demonstrated. Adopting Tb55R20Cu25 alloys as GBD sources is effective in increasing coercivity to 29.0 kOe for R = None, 23.8 kOe for R = Y, 25.6 kOe for R = La, 28.0 kOe for R = Ce, respectively. Yet, (BH)max is slightly reduced to 46.2-48.2 MGOe. The preferential appearance of Cu at grain boundary and triple junction of the grains, and the core-shell structure occurred due to Tb at grain surface remarkably enhance the coercivity. Interestingly, higher coercivity enhancement per wt% Tb usage (ΔiHc/wt%Tb) of 7.2 kOe/wt% for the magnet with Tb55Ce25Cu25 than 5.9 kOe/wt% for that with Tb75Cu25 has been found due to the magnetic isolation effect caused by the preferential appearance of Ce at grain boundary, though a slight lower coercivity enhancement was found for the samples with R = Y and La. Lower melting point (637 °C) for Tb55Ce20Cu25 than Tb75Cu25 (743 °C) leads to larger diffusion depth of Tb into the magnet and therefore contributes to higher efficiency of coercivity enhancement for the magnet with R=Ce.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, National Chung Cheng University 1 , Chia-Yi 621, Taiwan
New Materials Research & Development Department, China Steel Corp. 2 , Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
R& D Department, Himag Magnetic Corporation 3 , Pingtung 912, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 82110.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
2. Scripta Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 53010.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.038 ↗
3. J. Appl. Phys. · 1986 · 59 · 87310.1063/1.336611 ↗
4. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 44 · 06400110.1088/0022-3727/44/6/064001 ↗
5. Scripta Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 52410.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.036 ↗
6. AIP Adv. · 2013 · 3 · 04213610.1063/1.4803657 ↗
7. J. Phys.-Condens. Mat. · 2014 · 26 · 06420210.1088/0953-8984/26/6/064202 ↗
8. Materials Transactions · 2016 · 57 · 196010.2320/matertrans.m2016160 ↗
9. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2006 · 42 · 290910.1109/tmag.2006.879906 ↗
10. Scripta Mater. · 2017 · 129 · 110.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.017 ↗
11. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2017 · 426 · 34010.1016/j.jmmm.2016.11.111 ↗
12. Scripta Mater. · 2018 · 148 · 2910.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.01.021 ↗
13. Acta Mater. · 2016 · 115 · 27810.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.003 ↗
14. J. Magn. Magne. Mater. · 2017 · 442 · 33810.1016/j.jmmm.2017.06.116 ↗
15. Arch. Metall. Mater. · 2017 · 62 · 126310.1515/amm-2017-0189 ↗
16. Scripta Mater. · 2018 · 155 · 5010.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.06.020 ↗
17. AIP Advanced · 2018 · 8 · 05620510.1063/1.5006575 ↗
18. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 490 · 16549810.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165498 ↗
19. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 476 · 13410.1016/j.jmmm.2018.12.048 ↗
20. Ser. Solid-State Sci. · 2007 · 155 · 27