journal article·2015-10-01Open access

Characterisation of dynamic behaviour of alumina ceramics: evaluation of stress uniformity

Zhiyong Wang, Peifeng Li

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 10

Abstract

Accurate characterisation of dynamic behaviour of ceramics requires the reliable split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) technique and the condition of uniaxial homogeneous specimen deformation. In this study, an experimentally validated 3D finite element model of the full scale SHPB experiment was developed to quantitatively evaluate the wave propagation in the bars and the stress distribution/evolution in the alumina specimen. Wave signals in both the SHPB experiments and the finite element model were analysed to characterise the dynamic behaviour of alumina. It was found that the equilibrium of both stresses within the specimen and forces at the specimen ends can be established in the intermediate stage of deformation. The validity of stress uniformity in the alumina specimen supports the assumption of uniaxial homogeneous specimen deformation in the SHPB and validates the characterisation of dynamic behaviour of alumina ceramics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nanyang Technological University School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, , Singapore

Funding

Nanyang Technological University

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 486610.1063/1.368729 ↗
2. Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2001 · 317 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01172-8 ↗
3. Eng. Fail. Anal. · 2011 · 18 · 160510.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.05.004 ↗
4. Ceram. Int. · 2011 · 37 · 236510.1016/j.ceramint.2011.03.034 ↗
5. Ceram. Int. · 2014 · 40 · 305310.1016/j.ceramint.2013.09.141 ↗
6. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. · 2014 · 122 · 27110.2109/jcersj2.122.271 ↗
7. Ceram. Int. · 2014 · 40 · 525510.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.097 ↗
8. Ceram. Int. · 2015 · 41 · 679310.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.126 ↗
9. J. Mater. Sci. · 2007 · 42 · 508510.1007/s10853-006-0955-1 ↗
10. Exp. Mech. · 2009 · 49 · 58710.1007/s11340-008-9129-1 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 7
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 6
13. Polymer · 2008 · 49 · 272810.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.018 ↗
14. Mech. Mater. · 2012 · 54 · 4310.1016/j.mechmat.2012.06.002 ↗
15. Ceram. Int. · 2015 · 40 · 1276310.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.110 ↗
16. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1994 · 77 · 26310.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06987.x ↗
17. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1993 · 76 · 53610.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03820.x ↗
18. J. Phys. IV · 1997 · 7 · 91
19. Exp. Mech. · 2004 · 44 · 30010.1007/BF02427897 ↗
20. Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2007 · 34 · 18910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.010 ↗
21. Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2009 · 36 · 6110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.04.007 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 1310.1063/1.2362979 ↗
23. Exp. Mech. · 2009 · 49 · 47910.1007/s11340-008-9145-1 ↗
24. AIP Conference Proceedings · 1994 · 309 · 98110.1063/1.46199 ↗
25. Int. J. Impact Eng. · 1994 · 15 · 72310.1016/0734-743X(94)90011-9 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 08351610.1063/1.3647769 ↗
27. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1981 · 64 · C3310.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb09570.x ↗