Impact of the cation-stoichiometry on the resistive switching and data retention of SrTiO3 thin films
Source abstract
Abstract
Resistive switching oxides are investigated at great length as promising candidates for the next generation of non-volatile memories. It is generally assumed that defects have a strong impact on the resistive switching properties of transition metal oxides. However, the correlation between different types of defect structures and the switching properties is still elusive. We deposited single-crystalline SrTiO3thin films with various cation stoichiometry by pulsed laser deposition to investigate the stoichiometry related and therefore defect dependent influence on the resistive switching properties. This letter will reveal the differences in initial states, forming steps, switching characteristics as well as retention times taking into account both point defects and extended defects. We then propose an explanation on the basis of oxygen vacancy generation and redistribution to elucidate the dependence of the resistive switching properties on the cation stoichiometry dependent defect structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Peter Grünberg Institute and JARA-FIT, FZ Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
Funding
Helmholtz Association · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Nature Materials · 2007 · 6 · 83310.1038/nmat2023 ↗
2. Nature Materials · 2010 · 9 · 40310.1038/nmat2748 ↗
3. Journal of Applied Physics · 2008 · 104 · 12371610.1063/1.3043879 ↗
4. Advanced Materials · 2007 · 19 · 223210.1002/adma.200602915 ↗
5. Proceedings of the IEEE · 2012 · 100 · 197910.1109/JPROC.2012.2188771 ↗
6. Journal of Applied Physics · 2010 · 108 · 12450410.1063/1.3520674 ↗
7. Advanced Materials · 2010 · 22 · 41110.1002/adma.200901493 ↗
8. 2000
9. Physical Review B · 2013 · 87 · 19540910.1103/PhysRevB.87.195409 ↗
10. Philosophical Magazine A · 2000 · 80 · 62110.1080/01418610008212072 ↗
11. Applied Physics Letters · 2011 · 99 · 17310910.1063/1.3656340 ↗
12. Journal of Applied Physics · 2008 · 103 · 10370310.1063/1.2921972 ↗
13. Applied Physics Letters · 2011 · 99 · 03311010.1063/1.3616136 ↗
14. Journal of Applied Physics · 2011 · 110 · 03450910.1063/1.3622623 ↗
15. Journal of Applied Physics · 2013 · 113 · 23451010.1063/1.4811525 ↗
16. Applied Physics Letters · 2013 · 102 · 18350410.1063/1.4804364 ↗
17. Applied Physics Letters · 2014 · 104 · 01350110.1063/1.4860961 ↗
18. Applied Physics Letters · 2012 · 101 · 13160110.1063/1.4754112 ↗
19. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · 2014 · 47 · 03400910.1088/0022-3727/47/3/034009 ↗
20. 2006
21. Advanced Functional Materials · 2011 · 21 · 448710.1002/adfm.201101117 ↗
22. Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 25402210.1088/0957-4484/22/25/254022 ↗
23. Journal of Applied Physics · 2011 · 110 · 12451810.1063/1.3671565 ↗
24. Journal of Applied Physics · 2011 · 110 · 05451410.1063/1.3633271 ↗
25. Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 1286410.1039/C4NR04083J ↗
26. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · 2012 · 24 · 48500210.1088/0953-8984/24/48/485002 ↗
27. Physical Review B · 2002 · 66 · 21411210.1103/PhysRevB.66.214112 ↗
28. Acta Materialia · 2015 · 89 · 34410.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.016 ↗