Micromagnetic simulation of the influence of grain boundary on cerium substituted Nd-Fe-B magnets
Source abstract
Abstract
A three-dimensional finite element model was performed to study the magnetization reversal of (CexNd1-x)2Fe14B nanocomposite permanent magnets. The influences of volume fraction, width and performance parameters of the grain boundary (GB) composition on the coercivity were analyzed by the method of micromagnetic simulation. The calculation results indicate that the structure and chemistry of GB phase play important roles in Nd2Fe14B-based magnets. An abnormal increase in the value of coercivity is found to be connected with the GB phase, approximately when the percentage of doped cerium is between 20% and 30%. While the coercivity decreases directly with the increase in cerium content instead of being abnormal when there is no GB phase in magnets at all or the value of magnetocrystalline anisotropy or exchange integral is too large.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetism, Institute of Physics, , Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 , Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
Funding
Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences · National Key Research Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 29 · 417610.1103/PhysRevB.29.4176 ↗
2. Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 82110.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
3. J. Appl. Phys. · 1985 · 57 · 410610.1063/1.334633 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07A70410.1063/1.3549603 ↗
5. Adv. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 226310.1002/adma.201404892 ↗
6. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 398 · 9610.1016/j.jmmm.2015.09.027 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. Mag. · 2016 · 52 · 1
8. Physica B · 2016 · 483 · 6910.1016/j.physb.2015.12.033 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 1072310.1103/PhysRevB.57.10723 ↗
10. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 278 · 12710.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.329 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 575210.1063/1.1412275 ↗
12. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2003 · 28 · 36610.1016/S0927-0256(03)00119-8 ↗
13. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. · 2009 · 79 · 130910.1002/nme.2579 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 76 · 705310.1063/1.358026 ↗
15. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1991 · 63 · 81910.1103/RevModPhys.63.819 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 09391510.1063/1.3393960 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 04240210.1063/1.4789527 ↗
18. Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 53610.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.05.038 ↗
19. Chin. Phys. B · 2016 · 25 · 352
20. IEEE Trans. Mag. · 2012 · 48 · 209210.1109/TMAG.2011.2174250 ↗
21. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. · 2015 · 22 · 41710.1007/s12613-015-1088-9 ↗