Third nearest neighbor parameterized tight binding model for graphene nano-ribbons
Source abstract
Abstract
The existing tight binding models can very well reproduce the ab initio band structure of a 2D graphene sheet. For graphene nano-ribbons (GNRs), the current sets of tight binding parameters can successfully describe the semi-conducting behavior of all armchair GNRs. However, they are still failing in reproducing accurately the slope of the bands that is directly associated with the group velocity and the effective mass of electrons. In this work, both density functional theory and tight binding calculations were performed and a new set of tight binding parameters up to the third nearest neighbors including overlap terms is introduced. The results obtained with this model offer excellent agreement with the predictions of the density functional theory in most cases of ribbon structures, even in the high-energy region. Moreover, this set can induce electron-hole asymmetry as manifested in results from density functional theory. Relevant outcomes are also achieved for armchair ribbons of various widths as well as for zigzag structures, thus opening a route for multi-scale atomistic simulation of large systems that cannot be considered using density functional theory.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
EM2C, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris Saclay, CNRS 1 , 92295 Châtenay Malabry, France
C2N, CNRS, Université Paris-sud, Université Paris Saclay 2 , 91405 Orsay, France
LIMMS, Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, CNRS-IIS UMI2820 3 , 4-6-1 Komaba Meguro-Ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
Funding
TRANSFLEXTEG EU Project
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 1994 · 352
2. Carbohydr. Polym. · 2015 · 126 · 4010.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.032 ↗
3. Technology · 1995 · 2 · 1
4. New J. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 9500310.1088/1367-2630/11/9/095003 ↗
5. J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · R41310.1088/0953-8984/15/10/201 ↗
6. Nanotechnology · 2015 · 26 · 49520210.1088/0957-4484/26/49/495202 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. · 1954 · 94 · 149810.1103/physrev.94.1498 ↗
8. 2014
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 21680310.1103/physrevlett.97.216803 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2008 · 77 · 1
11. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2014 · 89 · 1
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 1
13. J. Comput. Electron. · 2013 · 12 · 5610.1007/s10825-013-0436-0 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 3543910.1103/physrevb.76.035439 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. · 1947 · 71 · 62210.1103/physrev.71.622 ↗
16. Mod. Phys. Lett. B · 2011 · 25 · 16310.1142/s0217984911025663 ↗
17. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 10910.1103/revmodphys.81.109 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter · 1996 · 54 · 1795410.1103/physrevb.54.17954 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 16541410.1103/physrevb.75.165414 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 21680310.1103/physrevlett.97.216803 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2016 · 93 · 1
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 11511610.1103/physrevb.77.115116 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2010 · 81 · 3
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 7311410.1063/1.4893697 ↗
25. Solid. State. Electron. · 2009 · 53 · 46210.1016/j.sse.2008.07.015 ↗
26. Nano Res. · 2008 · 1 · 39510.1007/s12274-008-8039-y ↗
27. J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 23 · 504810.1103/physrevb.23.5048 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 364110.1103/physrevb.58.3641 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 140 · A113410.1103/physrev.140.a1133 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/physrevb.13.5188 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 468510.1103/physrevb.59.4685 ↗