journal article·2016-04-01Open access

Understanding the difference in cohesive energies between alpha and beta tin in DFT calculations

Fleur Legrain, Sergei Manzhos

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 4

Abstract

The transition temperature between the low-temperature alpha phase of tin to beta tin is close to the room temperature (Tαβ = 130C), and the difference in cohesive energy of the two phases at 0 K of about ΔEcoh =0.02 eV/atom is at the limit of the accuracy of DFT (density functional theory) with available exchange-correlation functionals. It is however critically important to model the relative phase energies correctly for any reasonable description of phenomena and technologies involving these phases, for example, the performance of tin electrodes in electrochemical batteries. Here, we show that several commonly used and converged DFT setups using the most practical and widely used PBE functional result in ΔEcoh ≈0.04 eV/atom, with different types of basis sets and with different models of core electrons (all-electron or pseudopotentials of different types), which leads to a significant overestimation of Tαβ. We show that this is due to the errors in relative positions of s and p –like bands, which, combined with different populations of these bands in α and β Sn, leads to overstabilization of alpha tin. We show that this error can be effectively corrected by applying a Hubbard +U correction to s –like states, whereby correct cohesive energies of both α and β Sn can be obtained with the same computational scheme. We quantify for the first time the effects of anharmonicity on ΔEcoh and find that it is negligible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National University of Singapore Department of Mechanical Engineering, , 117576, Singapore

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1963 · 11 · 19410.1103/PhysRevLett.11.194 ↗
2. Chem. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 321010.1021/cm900702d ↗
3. J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · A180110.1149/2.037211jes ↗
4. J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 160 · A86910.1149/2.103306jes ↗
5. Chem. Commun. · 2013 · 49 · 14910.1039/C2CC34673G ↗
6. Chem. Rev. · 2014 · 114 · 1144410.1021/cr500207g ↗
7. Mater. Today · 2012 · 15 · 54410.1016/S1369-7021(13)70012-9 ↗
8. Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 153910.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.002 ↗
9. ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 1110310.1021/nn404837d ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 28 · 180910.1103/PhysRevB.28.1809 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 08510410.1103/PhysRevB.79.085104 ↗
13. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2014 · 10 · 383210.1021/ct500532v ↗
14. J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 137210.1063/1.464304 ↗
15. J. Chem. Phys. · 1996 · 105 · 998210.1063/1.472933 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 15520710.1103/PhysRevB.83.155207 ↗
17. J. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 143 · 20470110.1063/1.4936284 ↗
18. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2013 · 25 · 38220410.1088/0953-8984/25/38/382204 ↗
19. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 678610.1021/am500554y ↗
20. MRS Proc. · 2014 · 1678 · mrss14-1678- n09-0610.1557/opl.2014.743 ↗
21. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 1484310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01099 ↗
22. Solid State Ionics · 2014 · 268 · 27310.1016/j.ssi.2014.03.002 ↗
23. J. Power Sources · 2013 · 233 · 34110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.114 ↗
24. APL Mat. · 2013 · 1 · 01100210.1063/1.4812323 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 1042110.1103/PhysRevB.57.10421 ↗
26. J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2010 · 56 · 49410.3938/jkps.56.494 ↗
27. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 17 · 556910.1039/C4CP05619A ↗
28. J. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 140 · 19110210.1063/1.4878735 ↗
29. J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 564810.1063/1.464913 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 52 · R546710.1103/PhysRevB.52.R5467 ↗
31. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
32. J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 274510.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
33. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2009 · 180 · 217510.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022 ↗
34. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
35. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 39 · 110.1080/10408436.2013.772503 ↗
36. Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · 199310.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993 ↗
37. 2005 · 50
38. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 23520910.1103/PhysRevB.70.235209 ↗
39. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 150510.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
40. J. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 110 · 894310.1063/1.478813 ↗
41. J. Chem. Phys. · 1987 · 87 · 596810.1063/1.453520 ↗
42. J. Chem. Phys. · 1985 · 82 · 29910.1063/1.448975 ↗
43. J. Chem. Phys. · 1985 · 82 · 28410.1063/1.448800 ↗
44. J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 113 · 256310.1063/1.1305880 ↗
45. Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 23 · 157610.1103/PhysRevB.23.1576 ↗
46. J. Phys. Chem. A · 2006 · 110 · 529510.1021/jp055253z ↗
47. Int. J. Quantum Chem. · 2014 · 114 · 1410.1002/qua.24521 ↗
48. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4948434 for details of the effect of U(s) on the electronic structure of a Sn atom and a Sn dimer computed in VASP and details of band structure of α and β tin computed in VASP.