journal article·2014-04-01Open access

Sensitivity studies for the main r process: β-decay rates

M. Mumpower, J. Cass, G. Passucci, R. Surman, A. Aprahamian

AIP Advances· Volume 4· Issue 4

Abstract

The pattern of isotopic abundances produced in rapid neutron capture, or r-process, nucleosynthesis is sensitive to the nuclear physics properties of thousands of unstable neutron-rich nuclear species that participate in the process. It has long been recognized that the some of the most influential pieces of nuclear data for r-process simulations are β-decay lifetimes. In light of experimental advances that have pushed measurement capabilities closer to the classic r-process path, we revisit the role of individual β-decay rates in the r process. We perform β-decay rate sensitivity studies for a main (A > 120) r process in a range of potential astrophysical scenarios. We study the influence of individual rates during (n, γ)-(γ, n) equilibrium and during the post-equilibrium phase where material moves back toward stability. We confirm the widely accepted view that the most important lifetimes are those of nuclei along the r-process path for each astrophysical scenario considered. However, we find in addition that individual β-decay rates continue to shape the final abundance pattern through the post-equilibrium phase, for as long as neutron capture competes with β decay. Many of the lifetimes important for this phase of the r process are within current or near future experimental reach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear physics research studies · Astronomical and nuclear sciences · Nuclear Physics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Notre Dame 1 Department of Physics, , Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA

Union College 2 Department of Physics & Astronomy, , Schenectady, New York 12308, USA

Funding

NSF

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1957 · 29 · 54710.1103/RevModPhys.29.547 ↗
2. Chalk River Rep. · 1957 · CRL-41
3. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2011 · 83 · 15710.1103/RevModPhys.83.157 ↗
4. Phys. Rep. · 2007 · 450 · 9710.1016/j.physrep.2007.06.002 ↗
5. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. · 2011 · 66 · 34610.1016/j.ppnp.2011.01.032 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. C · 2011 · 83 · 04580910.1103/PhysRevC.83.045809 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. C · 2012 · 85 · 04580110.1103/PhysRevC.85.045801 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. C · 2012 · 85 · 01580210.1103/PhysRevC.85.015802 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. C · 2012 · 85 · 04880110.1103/PhysRevC.85.048801 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. C · 2001 · 64 · 03580110.1103/PhysRevC.64.035801 ↗
11. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables · 2000 · 75 · 110.1006/adnd.2000.0834 ↗
12. Nucl. Phys. A · 2003 · 729 · 33710.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003 ↗
13. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables · 1995 · 59 · 18510.1006/adnd.1995.1002 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. C · 2003 · 67 · 05580210.1103/PhysRevC.67.055802 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. C · 2008 · 77 · 03580410.1103/PhysRevC.77.035804 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 180910.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1809 ↗
17. Nucl. Phys. A · 2006 · 777 · 67610.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.10.012 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. C · 2002 · 89 · 231101
19. Astrophys. J. · 2012 · 752 · 11710.1088/0004-637X/752/2/117 ↗
20. Astron. Astrophys. · 2007 · 467 · 122710.1051/0004-6361:20066983 ↗
21. Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys. · 2008 · 46 · 24110.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145207 ↗
22. Astron. Astrophys. · 2009 · 494 · 82910.1051/0004-6361:200810292 ↗
23. Astrophys. J. · 2011 · 738 · L3210.1088/2041-8205/738/2/L32 ↗
24. S. Rosswog, O. Korobkin, A. Arcones, and F.-K. Thielemann, arXiv:1307.2939 (2013).
25. Phys. Rev. C · 2009 · 79 · 04580910.1103/PhysRevC.79.045809 ↗
26. E. Phys. J. A · 2012 · 48 · 18410.1140/epja/i2012-12184-4 ↗
27. Proceedings of Science · 2012 · NIC-XII 154
28. 2013
29. arXiv:1309.0059 (2013).
30. Phys. Rev. C · 2012 · 86 · 03580310.1103/PhysRevC.86.035803 ↗
31. 2005
32. 2012