journal article·2017-12Open access

Field emission from carbon nanotube fibers in varying anode-cathode gap with the consideration of contact resistance

Peng Zhang, S. B. Fairchild, T. C. Back, Yi Luo

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 12

Abstract

This paper studies field emission (FE) from a single carbon nanotube (CNT) fiber with different anode-cathode (AK) gap distances. It is found that the field enhancement factor depends strongly on the finite AK gap distance, due to the combination of geometrical effects and possible fiber morphology change. The geometrical effects of AK gap distance on the field enhancement factor are confirmed using COMSOL simulations. The slope drop in the Fowler-Northeim (FN) plot of the FE data in the high voltage is related to the electrical contact resistance between the CNT fiber and the substrate. It is found that even a small series resistance to the field emitter (<30% of the emission gap impedance) can strongly modify the FE characteristics in the high voltage regime, inducing a strong deviation from the linear FN plot.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1226, USA

Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, WPAFB, Ohio 45433, USA

Funding

DOD | USAF | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.283824010.1063/1.2838240 ↗
2. D. Shiffler, T. K. Statum, T. W. Hussey, O. Zhou, and P. Mardahl, in Mod. Microw. Millim. Wave Power Electron. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2005), p. 691.
3. Armstrong C. M. · IEEE Spectr. Technol. Eng. Sci. News · 2015
4. 10.1063/1.493800610.1063/1.4938006 ↗
5. 10.1103/physrevlett.96.07740110.1103/physrevlett.96.077401 ↗
6. Evtukh A. · 201510.1002/9781119037989 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.497823110.1063/1.4978231 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.498712710.1063/1.4987127 ↗
9. 10.1109/27.88766210.1109/27.887662 ↗
10. 10.1109/tps.2012.219532810.1109/tps.2012.2195328 ↗
11. 10.1116/1.475925410.1116/1.4759254 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.481751610.1063/1.4817516 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.490078710.1063/1.4900787 ↗
14. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/10/10570610.1088/0957-4484/26/10/105706 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.122806110.1126/science.1228061 ↗
16. 10.1098/rspa.1928.009110.1098/rspa.1928.0091 ↗
17. 10.1016/s0038-1101(00)00218-510.1016/s0038-1101(00)00218-5 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.361584610.1063/1.3615846 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.489192810.1116/1.4891928 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.498368010.1063/1.4983680 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.04910.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.049 ↗
22. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/39/39570110.1088/0957-4484/19/39/395701 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.496411210.1063/1.4964112 ↗
24. 10.1116/1.59058810.1116/1.590588 ↗
25. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00890.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00890.x ↗
26. 10.1103/physrevlett.89.19760210.1103/physrevlett.89.197602 ↗
27. 10.3390/nano709027510.3390/nano7090275 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.11767010.1063/1.117670 ↗
29. 10.1103/physrevb.67.11540610.1103/physrevb.67.115406 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.497932010.1063/1.4979320 ↗
31. 10.1021/nl051397d10.1021/nl051397d ↗
32. 10.1116/1.497176810.1116/1.4971768 ↗
33. Haynes W. M. · 2013
34. 10.1063/1.345789910.1063/1.3457899 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.359675910.1063/1.3596759 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.487884110.1063/1.4878841 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.170268210.1063/1.1702682 ↗
38. 10.1038/srep0826610.1038/srep1453910.1038/srep0826610.1038/srep14539 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.87060310.1063/1.870603 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.222697710.1063/1.2226977 ↗
41. 10.1109/ted.2010.206956310.1109/ted.2010.2069563 ↗