Field emission from carbon nanotube fibers in varying anode-cathode gap with the consideration of contact resistance
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper studies field emission (FE) from a single carbon nanotube (CNT) fiber with different anode-cathode (AK) gap distances. It is found that the field enhancement factor depends strongly on the finite AK gap distance, due to the combination of geometrical effects and possible fiber morphology change. The geometrical effects of AK gap distance on the field enhancement factor are confirmed using COMSOL simulations. The slope drop in the Fowler-Northeim (FN) plot of the FE data in the high voltage is related to the electrical contact resistance between the CNT fiber and the substrate. It is found that even a small series resistance to the field emitter (<30% of the emission gap impedance) can strongly modify the FE characteristics in the high voltage regime, inducing a strong deviation from the linear FN plot.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1226, USA
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, WPAFB, Ohio 45433, USA
Funding
DOD | USAF | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.283824010.1063/1.2838240 ↗
2. D. Shiffler, T. K. Statum, T. W. Hussey, O. Zhou, and P. Mardahl, in Mod. Microw. Millim. Wave Power Electron. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2005), p. 691.
3. Armstrong C. M. · IEEE Spectr. Technol. Eng. Sci. News · 2015
4. 10.1063/1.493800610.1063/1.4938006 ↗
5. 10.1103/physrevlett.96.07740110.1103/physrevlett.96.077401 ↗
6. Evtukh A. · 201510.1002/9781119037989 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.497823110.1063/1.4978231 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.498712710.1063/1.4987127 ↗
9. 10.1109/27.88766210.1109/27.887662 ↗
10. 10.1109/tps.2012.219532810.1109/tps.2012.2195328 ↗
11. 10.1116/1.475925410.1116/1.4759254 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.481751610.1063/1.4817516 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.490078710.1063/1.4900787 ↗
14. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/10/10570610.1088/0957-4484/26/10/105706 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.122806110.1126/science.1228061 ↗
16. 10.1098/rspa.1928.009110.1098/rspa.1928.0091 ↗
17. 10.1016/s0038-1101(00)00218-510.1016/s0038-1101(00)00218-5 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.361584610.1063/1.3615846 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.489192810.1116/1.4891928 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.498368010.1063/1.4983680 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.04910.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.049 ↗
22. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/39/39570110.1088/0957-4484/19/39/395701 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.496411210.1063/1.4964112 ↗
24. 10.1116/1.59058810.1116/1.590588 ↗
25. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00890.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00890.x ↗
26. 10.1103/physrevlett.89.19760210.1103/physrevlett.89.197602 ↗
27. 10.3390/nano709027510.3390/nano7090275 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.11767010.1063/1.117670 ↗
29. 10.1103/physrevb.67.11540610.1103/physrevb.67.115406 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.497932010.1063/1.4979320 ↗
31. 10.1021/nl051397d10.1021/nl051397d ↗
32. 10.1116/1.497176810.1116/1.4971768 ↗
33. Haynes W. M. · 2013
34. 10.1063/1.345789910.1063/1.3457899 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.359675910.1063/1.3596759 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.487884110.1063/1.4878841 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.170268210.1063/1.1702682 ↗
38. 10.1038/srep0826610.1038/srep1453910.1038/srep0826610.1038/srep14539 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.87060310.1063/1.870603 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.222697710.1063/1.2226977 ↗
41. 10.1109/ted.2010.206956310.1109/ted.2010.2069563 ↗