journal article·2012-03-01Open access

Hysteresis losses in a dense superparamagnetic nanoparticle assembly

S. A. Gudoshnikov, B. Ya. Liubimov, N. A. Usov

AIP Advances· Volume 2· Issue 1

Abstract

The hysteresis losses of a dense assembly of magnetite nanoparticles with an average diameter D = 25 nm are measured in the frequency range f = 10 – 200 kHz for magnetic field amplitudes up to H0 = 400 Oe. The low frequency hysteresis loops of the assembly are obtained by means of integration of the electro-motive force signal arising in a small pick-up coil wrapped around a sample which contains 1 – 5 mg of a magnetite powder. It is proved experimentally that the specific absorption rate diminishes approximately 4.5 times when the sample aspect ratio decreases from 11.4 to 1. Theoretical estimate shows that experimentally measured hysteresis loops can be approximately described only by taking into account appreciable contributions of magnetic nanoparticles of both very small, D < 10 – 12 nm, and rather large, D > 30 nm, diameters. Thus the wide particle size distribution has to be assumed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Russian Academy of Sciences, (IZMIRAN) 1 Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, , 142190, Troitsk, Moscow region, Russia

Magnetic and Cryoelectronic Systems Ltd. 2 , 142190, Troitsk, Moscow region, Russia

Funding

Russian Academy of Sciences · Russian Foundation for Basic Research

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2006 · 18 · S291910.1088/0953-8984/18/38/S26 ↗
2. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 311 · 18710.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.1156 ↗
3. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2008 · 20 · 38521410.1088/0953-8984/20/38/385214 ↗
4. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 22400110.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 08392110.1063/1.3551582 ↗
6. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 293 · 8010.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.047 ↗
7. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 311 · 22410.1016/j.jmmm.2006.11.178 ↗
8. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2010 · 322 · 4910.1016/j.jmmm.2010.05.012 ↗
9. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 252 · 37010.1016/S0304-8853(02)00706-0 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 12390910.1063/1.3445879 ↗
11. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2009 · 321 · 150110.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.073 ↗
12. ASME Conf. Proc. · 2010 · 2010 · 731
13. Eur. Biophys. J. · 2008 · 37 · 22310.1007/s00249-007-0197-4 ↗
14. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2009 · 321 · 149310.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.070 ↗
15. Metrologia · 2010 · 47 · S11410.1088/0026-1394/47/2/S11 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 09B32210.1063/1.3355936 ↗
17. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2008 · 79 · 09390910.1063/1.2972172 ↗
18. 280