Artificial neural network-based spatial gradient models for large-eddy simulation of turbulence
Source abstract
Abstract
The subgrid-scale stress (SGS) of large-eddy simulation (LES) is modeled by artificial neural network-based spatial gradient models (ANN-SGMs). The velocity gradients at neighboring stencil locations are incorporated to improve the accuracy of the SGS stress. The consideration of the gradient terms in the stencil locations is in a semi-explicit form so that the deployed artificial neural network (ANN) can be considerably simplified. This leads to a much higher LES efficiency compared with previous “black-box” models while still retaining the level of accuracy in the a priori test. The correlation coefficients of the ANN-SGMs can be larger than 0.98 for the filter width in the inertial range. With the current formulation, the significances of the individual modeling terms are transparent, giving clear guidance to the potential condensation of the model, which further improves the LES efficiency. The computational cost of the current ANN-SGM method is found to be two orders lower than previous “black-box” models. In the a posteriori test, the ANN-SGM framework predicts more accurately the flow field compared with the traditional LES models. Both the flow statistics and the instantaneous field are accurately recovered. Finally, we show that the current model can be adapted to different filter widths with sufficient accuracy. These results demonstrate the advantage and great potential of the ANN-SGM framework as an attractive solution to the closure problem in large-eddy simulation of turbulence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Wind and Air Flow Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (96)
Show source-provided references
1. 2000
2. Turbulence modeling in the age of data10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547 ↗
3. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations, I. The basic experiment10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:gcewtp>2.3.co;2 ↗
4. The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments
5. A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers10.1017/s0022112070000691 ↗
6. 2006
7. 2009
8. A dynamic subgrid-scale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport10.1063/1.858164 ↗
9. Turbulence: The filtering approach10.1017/s0022112092001733 ↗
10. Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.1 ↗
11. A vortex-based model for the subgrid flux of a passive scalar10.1063/1.1287512 ↗
12. Reynolds-stress-constrained large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded turbulent flows10.1017/jfm.2012.150 ↗
13. Some recent developments in turbulence closure modeling10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045020 ↗
14. Effect of filter type on the statistics of energy transfer between resolved and sub-filter scales from a-priori analysis of direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence10.1080/14685248.2017.1417597 ↗
15. A dynamic subgridscale eddy-viscosity model10.1063/1.857955 ↗
16. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid scale closure method10.1063/1.858280 ↗
17. Improved subgrid scale models for large eddy simulation
18. On the properties of similarity subgridscale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet10.1017/s0022112094002296 ↗
19. The subgrid-scale modeling of compressible turbulence10.1063/1.866778 ↗
20. Toward the large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows10.1017/s0022112092001678 ↗
21. Direct and large-eddy simulations of three-dimensional compressible Navier Stokes turbulence10.1063/1.858491 ↗
22. Constrained subgrid-scale stress model for large eddy simulation10.1063/1.2831134 ↗
23. Evaluation of sub-grid scalar models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow10.1017/s002211207900001x ↗
24. New insights into large eddy simulation10.1016/0169-5983(92)90023-p ↗
25. On the use of shock-capturing schemes for large-eddy simulation10.1006/jcph.1999.6268 ↗
26. An implicit LES approach based on high-order compact differencing and filtering schemes (Invited)
27. Implicit subgrid-scale modeling by adaptive deconvolution10.1016/j.jcp.2004.04.010 ↗
28. 2007
29. On the modelling of the subgrid-scale and filtered-scale stress tensors in large-eddy simulation10.1017/s0022112001004773 ↗
30. Numerical behaviour of a new LES model with nonlinear viscosity10.1016/j.cam.2020.112868 ↗
31. Two-point stress-strain-rate correlation structure and non-local eddy viscosity in turbulent flows10.1017/jfm.2020.977 ↗
32. Statistical properties of subgrid-scale turbulence models10.1146/annurev-fluid-060420-023735 ↗
33. 1992
34. Search for subgrid scale parameterization by projection pursuit regression
35. A proposed statistical-dynamic closure method for the linear and non-linear subgrid-scale stresses10.1063/1.858261 ↗
36. Geometry and scale relationships in high Reynolds number turbulence determined from three-dimensional holographic velocimetry10.1063/1.870348 ↗
37. Determination of the Smagorinsky–Lilly constant Cs10.1063/1.869251 ↗
38. Subgrid-scale modelling for the large-eddy simulation of high-Reynolds-number boundary layers10.1017/s0022112096004697 ↗
39. Statistical geometry of subgrid-scale stresses determined from holographic particle image velocimetry measurements10.1017/s0022112001007443 ↗
40. A dynamic nonlinear subgrid-scale stress model10.1063/1.1858511 ↗
41. Neural networks based subgrid scale modeling in large eddy simulations10.1016/s0045-7930(01)00098-6 ↗
42. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance10.1017/jfm.2016.615 ↗
43. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for prediction of regions of high Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes uncertainty10.1063/1.4927765 ↗
44. Quantifying and reducing model-form uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations: A data-driven, physics-informed Bayesian approach10.1016/j.jcp.2016.07.038 ↗
45. Machine learning strategies for systems with invariance properties10.1016/j.jcp.2016.05.003 ↗
46. Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data10.1103/physrevfluids.2.034603 ↗
47. J. L. Wu, H. Xiao, and E. Paterson, “Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approach for Augmenting Turbulence Models: A Comprehensive Framework,” Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 074602 (2018).10.1103/physrevfluids.3.07460210.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.074602 ↗
48. Investigations of data-driven closure for subgrid-scale stress in large-eddy simulation10.1063/1.5054835 ↗
49. Data-driven deconvolution for large eddy simulations of Kraichnan turbulence10.1063/1.5079582 ↗
50. Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils10.1063/1.5061693 ↗
51. Data-driven construction of a reduced-order model for supersonic boundary layer transition10.1017/jfm.2019.470 ↗
52. Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes equations with explicit data driven Reynolds stress closure can be ill conditioned10.1017/jfm.2019.205 ↗
53. Deep neural networks for data-driven turbulence models10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108910 ↗
54. Predictive large-eddy-simulation wall modeling via physics-informed neural networks10.1103/physrevfluids.4.034602 ↗
55. Artificial neural network mixed model for large eddy simulation of compressible isotropic turbulence10.1063/1.5110788 ↗
56. Uniformly accurate machine learning-based hydrodynamic models for kinetic equations10.1073/pnas.1909854116 ↗
57. Searching for turbulence models by artificial neural network10.1103/physrevfluids.2.054604 ↗
58. Subgrid-scale scalar flux modelling based on optimal estimation theory and machine-learning procedures10.1080/14685248.2017.1334907 ↗
59. Model reduction with memory and the machine learning of dynamical systems10.4208/cicp.oa-2018-0269 ↗
60. Subgrid modelling for two-dimensional turbulence using neural networks10.1017/jfm.2018.770 ↗
61. Toward neural-network-based large eddy simulation: Application to turbulent channel flow10.1017/jfm.2020.931 ↗
62. Data-driven subgrid-scale modeling of forced Burgers turbulence using deep learning with generalization to higher Reynolds numbers via transfer learning10.1063/5.0040286 ↗
63. Subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of isotropic turbulent flows using an artificial neural network10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104319 ↗
64. Artificial neural network approach to large-eddy simulation of compressible isotropic turbulence10.1103/physreve.99.053113 ↗
65. Modeling subgrid-scale force and divergence of heat flux of compressible isotropic turbulence by artificial neural network10.1103/physrevfluids.4.104605 ↗
66. Spatial artificial neural network model for subgrid-scale stress and heat flux of compressible turbulence10.1016/j.taml.2020.01.006 ↗
67. Modeling subgrid-scale forces by spatial artificial neural networks in large eddy simulation of turbulence10.1103/physrevfluids.5.054606 ↗
68. Instability of the perfect subgrid model in implicit-filtering large eddy simulation of geostrophic turbulence10.1103/physreve.75.046303 ↗
69. Spatially multi-scale artificial neural network model for large eddy simulation of compressible isotropic turbulence10.1063/1.5138681 ↗
70. Artificial neural network-based nonlinear algebraic models for large eddy simulation of turbulence10.1063/5.0025138 ↗
71. The local structure of atmospheric turbulence and its effect on the Smagorinsky model for large eddy simulation10.1175/jas3930.1 ↗
72. Deconvolutional artificial neural network models for large eddy simulation of turbulence10.1063/5.0027146 ↗
73. Localness of energy cascade in hydrodynamic turbulence. I. Smooth coarse graining10.1063/1.3266883 ↗
74. Compressible turbulence: The cascade and its locality10.1103/physrevlett.106.174502 ↗
75. Study of high-Reynolds number isotropic turbulence by direct numerical simulation10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165203 ↗
76. Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows10.1016/s0065-2687(08)60464-1 ↗
77. Subgrid-modeling in LES of compressible flow10.1007/bf00849116 ↗
78. A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis10.1017/s0022112075003382 ↗
79. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks
80. Forecasting with artificial neural networks: The state of the art10.1016/s0169-2070(97)00044-7 ↗
81. 2014
82. Kinetic energy transfer in compressible isotropic turbulence10.1017/jfm.2018.23 ↗
83. Small-scale statistics in high-resolution direct numerical simulation of turbulence: Reynolds number dependence of one-point velocity gradient statistics10.1017/s0022112007008531 ↗
84. Spectral calculations of isotropic turbulence: Efficient removal of aliasing interactions10.1063/1.1693365 ↗
85. A hybrid numerical simulation of isotropic compressible turbulence10.1016/j.jcp.2010.03.042 ↗
86. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
87. A modified optimal LES model for highly compressible isotropic turbulence10.1063/1.5027754 ↗
88. An analysis of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulence10.1006/jcph.1996.0088 ↗
89. Database analysis of errors in large-eddy simulation10.1063/1.1597683 ↗
90. A further study of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations10.1016/s0021-9991(02)00020-7 ↗
91. Direct testing of subgrid scale models10.2514/3.61313 ↗
92. Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/035 ↗
93. Grid-independent large-eddy simulation using explicit filtering10.1063/1.3485774 ↗
94. Explicit filtering to obtain grid-spacing-independent and discretization-order-independent large-eddy simulation of compressible single-phase flow10.1017/jfm.2012.73 ↗
95. A grid-independent length scale for large-eddy simulations10.1017/jfm.2015.29 ↗
96. Resolution-induced anisotropy in large-eddy simulations10.1103/physrevfluids.4.114605 ↗