Controlling the anisotropy and domain structure with oblique deposition and substrate rotation
Source abstract
Abstract
Effect of substrate rotation on anisotropy and domain structure for a thin ferromagnetic film has been investigated in this work. For this purpose Co films with 10 nm thickness have been prepared by sputtering with oblique angle of incidence for various substrate rotations. This method of preparation induces a uniaxial anisotropy due to shadow deposition effect. The magnetization reversal is studied by magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) based microscope in the longitudinal geometry. The Co films prepared by rotating the substrate with 10 and 20 rpm weakens the anisotropy but does not completely give isotropic films. But this leads to high dispersion in local grain anisotropy resulting in ripple and labyrinth domains. It is observed that the substrate rotation has moderate effect on uniaxial anisotropy but has significant effect on the magnetization reversal process and the domain structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER) School of Physical Sciences, , IOP Campus, Bhubaneswar-751005, India
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106 · 07610110.1063/1.3223538 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 1960 · 31 · 1010.1063/1.1735441 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 17660110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.176601 ↗
4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1960 · 15 · 93610.1143/JPSJ.15.936 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 02250710.1063/1.3463458 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 08250510.1063/1.2032592 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. · 1959 · 113 · 103910.1103/PhysRev.113.1039 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 79 · 494510.1063/1.361597 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 196310.1063/1.1432125 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 403810.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4038 ↗
11. Europhys. Lett. · 2006 · 75 · 11910.1209/epl/i2006-10089-5 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 17444110.1103/PhysRevB.63.174441 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 17440210.1103/PhysRevB.69.174402 ↗
14. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2011 · 47 · 392810.1109/TMAG.2011.2154302 ↗
15. Proceedings of magneto-optical recording international symposium 96
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 1961 · 32 · 195910.1063/1.1728270 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 1963 · 34 · 184110.1063/1.1729697 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 1962 · 33 · 139910.1063/1.1728745 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 1960 · 31 · 23810.1063/1.1735552 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 549110.1063/1.1562732 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 1968 · 39 · 150310.1063/1.1656388 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 13240310.1103/PhysRevB.84.132403 ↗
23. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1996 · 59 · 140910.1088/0034-4885/59/11/002 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys · 2012 · 111 · 12391810.1063/1.4730632 ↗