journal article·2017-05-01Open access

Magnetic hyperthermia performance of magnetite nanoparticle assemblies under different driving fields

Kai Wu, Jian-Ping Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 5

Abstract

The heating performance of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) under an alternating magnetic field (AMF) is dependent on several factors. Optimizing these factors improves the heating efficiency for cancer therapy and meanwhile lowers the MNP treatment dosage. AMF is one of the most easily controllable variables to enhance the efficiency of heat generation. This paper investigated the optimal magnetic field strength and frequency for an assembly of magnetite nanoparticles. For hyperthermia treatment in clinical applications, monodispersed NPs are forming nanoclusters in target regions where a strong magnetically interactive environment is anticipated, which leads to a completely different situation than MNPs in ferrofluids. Herein, the energy barrier model is revisited and Néel relaxation time is tailored for high MNP packing densities. AMF strength and frequency are customized for different magnetite NPs to achieve the highest power generation and the best hyperthermia performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Minnesota The Center for Micromagnetics and Information Technologies (MINT) and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Funding

MNDrive STEM program · National Science Foundation MRSEC facility program · College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Langmuir · 2016
2. Physical Review B · 1997 · 56 · 1398310.1103/physrevb.56.13983 ↗
3. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2014 · 354 · 16310.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.006 ↗
4. Medical Physics Monograph · 1988 · 16 · 82
5. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2015 · 387 · 9610.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.085 ↗
6. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2002 · 252 · 37010.1016/s0304-8853(02)00706-0 ↗
7. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · 2008 · 41 · 13400310.1088/0022-3727/41/13/134003 ↗
8. Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 26510210.1088/0957-4484/22/26/265102 ↗
9. Journal of Applied Physics · 1994 · 76 · 490010.1063/1.357270 ↗
10. Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on · 2015 · 51 · 110.1109/tmag.2014.2322579 ↗
11. Journal of Applied Physics · 2007 · 101 · 09M51610.1063/1.2712825 ↗
12. V. B. Barbeta, R. d. F. Jardim, P. K. Kiyohara, F. B. Effenberger, and L. M. Rossi, preprint arXiv:1004.2231 (2010).
13. Journal of Applied Physics · 2009 · 105 · 07B50110.1063/1.3055272 ↗
14. Nanoscale · 2011 · 3 · 22510.1039/c0nr00521e ↗
15. Journal of Applied Physics · 2012 · 112 · 02390110.1063/1.4737126 ↗
16. Physical Review B · 2005 · 72 · 21440610.1103/physrevb.72.214406 ↗
17. Physical Review Letters · 2005 · 94 · 02720210.1103/physrevlett.94.027202 ↗
18. Physical Review B · 2000 · 62 · 112410.1103/physrevb.62.1124 ↗
19. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2009 · 321 · 140010.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.047 ↗
20. Physical Review B · 2009 · 80 · 09240610.1103/physrevb.80.092406 ↗
21. Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging · 2012 · 7 · 30810.1002/cmmi.499 ↗
22. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2015 · 119 · 2414210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07516 ↗
23. Physical Review Letters · 1989 · 63 · 45710.1103/physrevlett.63.457 ↗
24. Physical Review B · 2014 · 89 · 01440310.1103/physrevb.89.014403 ↗