journal article·2015-08-01Open access

Dependence of optimal spacing on applied field in ungated field emitter arrays

J. R. Harris, K. L. Jensen, D. A. Shiffler

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 8

Abstract

In ungated field emitter arrays, the field enhancement factor β of each emitter tip is reduced below the value it would have in isolation due to the presence of adjacent emitters, an effect known as shielding or screening. Reducing the distance b between emitters increases the density of emission sites, but also reduces the emission per site, leading to the existence of an optimal spacing that maximizes the array current. Most researchers have identified that this optimal spacing is comparable to the emitter height h, although there is disagreement about the exact optimization. Here, we develop a procedure to determine the dependence of this optimal spacing on the applied electric field. It is shown that the nature of this dependence is governed by the shape of the β(b) curve, and that for typical curves, the optimal value of the emitter spacing b decreases as the applied field increases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Navy Operational Support Center New Orleans 1 U.S. Navy Reserve, , New Orleans, LA 70143, USA

Naval Research Laboratory 2 Code 6364, , Washington, DC 20375, USA

3Directed Energy Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM 87117, USA

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 2005 · 437 · 96810.1038/437968a ↗
2. IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation · 1989 · 24 · 76510.1109/14.42158 ↗
3. Applied Physics Letters · 2007 · 91 · 12150410.1063/1.2785116 ↗
4. Status of the Dielectric Wall Accelerator
5. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams · 2013 · 16 · 09200110.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.092001 ↗
6. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams · 2011 · 14 · 05350110.1103/PhysRevSTAB.14.053501 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 1976 · 47 · 524810.1063/1.322600 ↗
8. Applied Physics Letters · 2001 · 79 · 350610.1063/1.1419038 ↗
9. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 1991 · 38 · 235510.1109/16.88525 ↗
10. Modelling Field Emitter Arrays using Line Charge Distributions
11. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 1991 · 38 · 153410.1109/16.81650 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1991 · 38 · 227610.1109/16.88510 ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Plas. Sci. · 2004 · 32 · 126210.1109/TPS.2004.827608 ↗
14. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology: Part B-Microelectronics & Nanometer Structures · 2006 · 24 · 34510.1116/1.2161223 ↗
15. Nano Letters · 2005 · 5 · 213510.1021/nl051397d ↗
16. Journal of Applied Physics · 2011 · 110 · 03490510.1063/1.3615846 ↗
17. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B · 2012 · 30 · 06180310.1116/1.4759254 ↗
18. Applied Physics Letters · 2000 · 76 · 207110.1063/1.126258 ↗
19. Applied Physics Letters · 2002 · 80 · 2393
20. Physical Review B · 2007 · 76 · 19541210.1103/PhysRevB.76.195412 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 09610210.1063/1.4711091 ↗
22. Ultramicroscopy · 2005 · 102 · 18110.1016/j.ultramic.2004.08.009 ↗
23. Technical Physics · 2005 · 50 · 94410.1134/1.1994978 ↗
24. Applied Physics Letters · 2009 · 94 · 13310410.1063/1.3097239 ↗
25. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B · 2014 · 32 · 05220210.1116/1.4891928 ↗
26. IEEE Trans. Plas. Sci. · 2014 · 42 · 258010.1109/TPS.2014.2322996 ↗
27. Applied Physics Letters · 2015 · 106 · 20160310.1063/1.4921709 ↗
28. Journal of Applied Physics · 2015 · 117 · 19490210.1063/1.4921186 ↗
29. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams · 2014 · 17 · 04340210.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.043402 ↗
30. Webster · 2014
31. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B · 2000 · 18 · 66510.1116/1.591258 ↗
32. J. Appl. Phys. · 1993 · 73 · 148510.1063/1.353223 ↗
34. Nanotechnology · 2005 · 16 · 8810.1088/0957-4484/16/1/018 ↗
35. Effective Field Enhancement Factor and the Influence of Emitted Space Charge