Coercivity enhancement of Nd-Fe-B hot-deformed magnets by the eutectic grain boundary diffusion process using Nd-Ga-Cu and Nd-Fe-Ga-Cu alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Nd80Ga15Cu5 and Nd62Fe14Ga20Cu4 alloys were used as diffusion sources for the eutectic grain boundary diffusion process, applying to 4 mm-thick Nd-Fe-B hot-deformed magnets. Both samples showed nearly same coercivity of 2.2 T, while the sample processed with Nd62Fe14Ga20Cu4 showed smaller remanence deterioration from 1.50 T to 1.30 T, in contrast to that of the sample processed with Nd80Ga15Cu5 to 1.08 T. Mr/Ms of the initial sample and the samples processed with Nd62Fe14Ga20Cu4 and Nd80Ga15Cu5 were 0.946, 0.934 and 0.917, respectively, suggesting that the sample processed with Nd62Fe14Ga20Cu4 retains stronger c-axis texture after the diffusion process. Nd-rich phases with Ia3¯ and fcc structures were observed in the sample processed with Nd80Ga15Cu5, while the Nd-rich phases with the Ia3¯ and hcp structures were found in the sample processed with Nd62Fe14Ga20Cu4, all of which are the phases commonly observed in Nd-Fe-B sintered magnets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Elements Strategy Initiative Center for Magnetic Materials, National Institute of Materials Science 1 , Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan
Graduate School of Pure and Applied Science, University of Tsukuba 2 , Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan
Toyota Motor Corporation, Advanced Material Engineering Div. 3 , Susono 410-1193, Japan
Funding
Japan Science Technology Agency
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 1984 · 55 · 208310.1063/1.333572 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1985 · MAG-21 · 195810.1109/tmag.1985.1064031 ↗
3. Acta Mater. · 2015 · 82 · 33610.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.021 ↗
4. Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 538710.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.027 ↗
5. Scripta Mater. · 2011 · 65 · 39610.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.006 ↗
6. Scripta Mater. · 2010 · 63 · 112410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.021 ↗
7. J. Alloy. Compd. · 2016 · 666 · 43210.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.227 ↗
8. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 412 · 23410.1016/j.jmmm.2016.04.005 ↗
9. Scripta Mater. · 2014 · 81 · 4810.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.03.002 ↗
10. K. Nakajima and T. Yamazaki, JPN Patent, 5767788 (2015).
11. Scripta Mater. · 2013 · 113 · 218
12. Phys. B · 1990 · 164 · 11710.1016/0921-4526(90)90068-6 ↗
13. Mater. Sci. · 1987 · 96 · 65
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 1982 · 53 · 164910.1063/1.330614 ↗
15. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1988 · 74 · 29110.1016/0304-8853(88)90202-8 ↗
16. Scripta Mater. · 2014 · 89 · 2910.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.06.020 ↗
17. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2001 · 223 · 26110.1016/s0304-8853(00)01272-5 ↗
18. Scripta Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 17910.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.03.004 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 05350410.1063/1.1851017 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Express · 2016 · 9 · 01300210.7567/apex.9.013002 ↗
21. Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 405310.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.004 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 1950 · 21 · 42010.1063/1.1699676 ↗
23. Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 298510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00264 ↗
24. Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 160643010.1002/adma.201606430 ↗