On the validity of the Navier-Stokes equations for nanoscale liquid flows: The role of channel size
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we investigate the validity of the Navier-Stokes (NS) equations for nanoscale liquid flows through molecular dynamics simulations. We focus on the role of channel size by considering the fluid-wall interaction. Liquid flows between two planar parallel walls driven by an external force with channel size ranging from 2 to 80 nm are studied. The volumetric flux is computed and the dependence of the volumetric flux on the channel size is explained both qualitatively and quantitatively. It is found that the flow is sensitive to the fluid-wall binding energy and the classical fluid mechanics falls apart in small nanochannels. However, the wall effects become insignificant and the NS equations are valid when the channel size is larger than about 150 molecular diameters (∼ 50 nm).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2005 · 77 · 97710.1103/RevModPhys.77.977 ↗
2. 2008
3. 1998
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 17450110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.174501 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. E · 2009 · 80 · 03630210.1103/PhysRevE.80.036302 ↗
6. J. Chem. Phys. · 1987 · 87 · 173310.1063/1.453240 ↗
7. Phys. Fluids A · 1989 · 1 · 78110.1063/1.857376 ↗
8. J. Chem. Phys. · 1992 · 96 · 538910.1063/1.462724 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. A · 1989 · 40 · 114410.1103/PhysRevA.40.1144 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 349110.1103/PhysRevLett.69.3491 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 467110.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4671 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. A · 1990 · 41 · 683010.1103/PhysRevA.41.6830 ↗
13. Nature · 1997 · 389 · 36010.1038/39475 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 86 · 80310.1103/PhysRevLett.86.803 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 10610210.1103/PhysRevLett.88.106102 ↗
16. Langmuir · 2004 · 20 · 347710.1021/la035880k ↗
17. J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 124 · 20470110.1063/1.2194019 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. E · 2007 · 75 · 05160510.1103/PhysRevE.75.051605 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. E · 1997 · 55 · 428810.1103/PhysRevE.55.4288 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. E · 2009 · 80 · 04632210.1103/PhysRevE.80.046322 ↗
21. Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 223710.1021/nl0484907 ↗
22. Phys. Fluids · 2002 · 14 · L510.1063/1.1429249 ↗
23. J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 127 · 05470310.1063/1.2749236 ↗
24. Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 278810.1021/nl8013617 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 18450210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.184502 ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 15410110.1063/1.3247892 ↗
27. J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 22470210.1063/1.2739541 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 01450210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.014502 ↗
29. J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 02450710.1063/1.3292682 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 2210.1103/PhysRevB.48.22 ↗
31. J. Chem. Phys. · 1983 · 78 · 670910.1063/1.444670 ↗
32. J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 272310.1021/jp952324t ↗
33. Phys. Rev. E · 2003 · 68 · 06120710.1103/PhysRevE.68.061207 ↗
34. Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 515 · 2110.1016/S0039-6028(02)01916-7 ↗
35. 1987
36. Phys. Rev. E · 2009 · 80 · 06120410.1103/PhysRevE.80.061204 ↗
37. Phys. Rev. E · 2009 · 79 · 02631210.1103/PhysRevE.79.026312 ↗
38. J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 09470310.1063/1.3327931 ↗
39. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 20600110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.206001 ↗
40. J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 112 · 198410.1063/1.480758 ↗
41. J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 124 · 23470110.1063/1.2209236 ↗