journal article·2024-04-01Open access

The principle of minimum pressure gradient: An alternative basis for physics-informed learning of incompressible fluid mechanics

H. Alhussein, M. Daqaq

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 4

Abstract

Recent advances in the application of physics-informed learning in the field of fluid mechanics have been predominantly grounded in the Newtonian framework, primarily leveraging Navier–Stokes equations or one of their various derivatives to train a neural network. Here, we propose an alternative approach based on variational methods. The proposed approach uses the principle of minimum pressure gradient combined with the continuity constraint to train a neural network and predict the flow field in incompressible fluids. We describe the underlying principles of the proposed approach, then use a demonstrative example to illustrate its implementation, and show that it reduces the computational time per training epoch when compared to the conventional approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Engineering Division, New York University Abu Dhabi 1 , Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Tandon School of Engineering, New York University 2 , Brooklyn, New York 11201, USA

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 2000
2. 2000
3. 2002
4. Modeling of fluid-structure interaction10.1146/annurev.fluid.33.1.445 ↗
5. 2007
6. 2001
7. Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations10.1109/72.712178 ↗
8. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
9. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNS) for fluid mechanics: A review10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1 ↗
10. Physics-informed neural networks for solving Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations
11. Machine learning in aerodynamic shape optimization10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100849 ↗
12. Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4D flow MRI data using physics-informed neural networks10.1016/j.cma.2019.112623 ↗
13. Deep learning of free boundary and Stefan problems10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109914 ↗
14. Towards physics-informed deep learning for turbulent flow prediction
15. Physics-informed deep learning for incompressible laminar flows10.1016/j.taml.2020.01.039 ↗
16. Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in nano-optics and metamaterials10.1364/oe.384875 ↗
17. Physics-informed graph neural Galerkin networks: A unified framework for solving PDE-governed forward and inverse problems10.1016/j.cma.2021.114502 ↗
18. Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems10.1115/1.4050542 ↗
19. On pressure boundary conditions for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations10.1002/fld.1650071008 ↗
20. 2012
21. A note on Hamilton’s principle for perfect fluids10.1017/s0022112070001660 ↗
22. Hamiltonian fluid mechanics10.1146/annurev.fluid.20.1.225 ↗
23. Hamiltonian description of the ideal fluid10.1103/revmodphys.70.467 ↗
24. A variational theory of lift10.1017/jfm.2022.348 ↗
25. A minimization principle for incompressible fluid mechanics10.1063/5.0175959 ↗
26. H. Alhussein and M.Daqaq, “The principle of minimum pressure gradient: An alternative basis for physics-informed learning of incompressible fluid mechanics,” arXiv:2401.07489 (2024).10.1063/5.0197860 ↗
27. A novel approach for data-free, physics-informed neural networks in fluid mechanics using the principle of minimum pressure gradient
28. On the foundations of analytical dynamics10.1016/s0020-7462(01)00033-6 ↗
29. The general Gauss principle of least constraint10.1115/1.4062887 ↗
30. Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks10.1016/s0169-7439(97)00061-0 ↗
31. Penalty and augmented Lagrangian methods
32. 2005 · 105
33. C. Nwankpa , W.Ijomah, A.Gachagan, and S.Marshall, “Activation functions: Comparison of trends in practice and research for deep learning,” arXiv:1811.03378 (2018).
34. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks
35. D. P. Kingma and J.Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
36. Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization10.1145/279232.279236 ↗