Show source-provided references
1. PLC · 2012
2. Emerging green strategies for biogas upgrading through CO2 capture: From unconventional organic solvents to clathrate and semi-clathrate hydrates
10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123196 ↗3. A combination model based on wavelet transform for predicting the difference between monthly natural gas production and consumption of U.S.
10.1016/j.energy.2021.121216 ↗4. Fastest-growing source prediction of US electricity production based on a novel hybrid model using wavelet transform
10.1002/er.7293 ↗5. Biological carbon capture from biogas streams: Insights into Cupriavidus necator autotrophic growth and transcriptional profile
10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130556 ↗7. Carbon dioxide removal potential from decentralised bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and the relevance of operational choices
10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106406 ↗12. RETRACTED: Biogas production–A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion
10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.093 ↗13. Performance of a biogas upgrading process based on alkali absorption with regeneration using air pollution control residues
10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.022 ↗20. Life cycle inventories of waste treatment services
21. 2010
24. Biomethane production from anaerobic co-digestion at wastewater treatment plants: A critical review on development and innovations in biogas upgrading techniques
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142753 ↗29. An overview of biogas upgrading via pressure swing adsorption: Navigating through bibliometric insights towards a conceptual framework and future research pathways
10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118268 ↗30. Hydrogen-enriched biogas premixed charge combustion and emissions in direct injection and indirect injection diesel dual fueled engines: A comparative study
10.1115/1.4051574 ↗31. Evaluating the scientific contributions of biogas technology on rural development through scientometric analysis
10.1016/j.eti.2021.101879 ↗32. Life cycle assessment of electricity from biogas: A systematic literature review
10.1002/ep.13133 ↗33. Experimental and modeling analyzing the biogas upgrading in the microchannel: Carbon dioxide capture by seawater enriched with low-cost waste materials
10.1016/j.eti.2022.102770 ↗36. Comparative life cycle assessment of polymeric membranes: Polyacrylonitrile, polyvinylimidazole and poly (acrylonitrile-co-vinylimidazole) applied for CO2 sequestration
10.1016/j.eti.2021.101507 ↗40. Chapter 4—Factors affecting CO2 and CH4 separation during biogas upgrading in a water scrubbing process
41. Unveiling the critical role of biogas compositions on carbon dioxide separation in biogas upgrading using pressure swing adsorption
10.1007/s13399-021-02106-4 ↗42. Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: State of the art and future challenges
10.1039/d0cs00025f ↗45. On the adsorption/oxidation of hydrogen sulfide on activated carbons at ambient temperatures
10.1006/jcis.2001.7952 ↗46. Ultra-microporous biochar-based carbon adsorbents by a facile chemical activation strategy for high-performance CO2 adsorption
10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107613 ↗47. How much can novel solid sorbents reduce the cost of post-combustion CO2 capture? A techno-economic investigation on the cost limits of pressure–vacuum swing adsorption
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117955 ↗48. CO2 capture activity of a novel CaO adsorbent stabilized with (ZrO2 + Al2O3 + CeO2)-based additive under mild and realistic calcium looping conditions
10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101747 ↗50. 2012 · 347
53. On the use of plastic precursors for preparation of activated carbons and their evaluation in CO2 capture for biogas upgrading: A review
10.1016/j.wasman.2023.02.022 ↗54. Carbon dioxide capture through physical and chemical adsorption using porous carbon materials: A review
10.3390/atmos13030397 ↗59. An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.017 ↗61. Biogas from palm oil mill effluent: Characterization and removal of CO2 using modified clinoptilolite zeolites in a fixed-bed column
10.14716/ijtech.v7i4.2207 ↗62. Cost-effective CO2 capture based on in silico screening of zeolites and process optimization
10.1039/c3cp53627k ↗64. Exploring new sources of efficiency in process-driven materials screening for post-combustion carbon capture
10.1039/c9ee03977e ↗65. Exploring the limits of adsorption-based CO2 capture using MOFs with PVSA–from molecular design to process economics
10.1039/c9me00102f ↗67. Novel post-treatment of ultrasound assisting with acid washing enhance lignin-based biochar for CO2 capture: Adsorption performance and mechanism
10.1016/j.cej.2023.144523 ↗74. Functionalization of metal–organic frameworks for enhanced stability under humid carbon dioxide capture conditions
10.1002/cssc.201500580 ↗76. Enhanced dynamic CO2 adsorption capacity and CO2/CH4 selectivity on polyethylenimine-impregnated UiO-66
10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03517 ↗77. Highly efficient CO2 capture with a metal–organic framework-derived porous carbon impregnated with polyethyleneimine
10.1002/aoc.4390 ↗78. Incorporation of acetate-based ionic liquids into a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) as efficient sorbents for carbon dioxide capture
10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.104 ↗79. Design of steam-assisted temperature vacuum-swing adsorption processes for efficient CO2 capture from ambient air
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110651 ↗80. Adsorption-enrichment characterization of CO2 and dynamic retention of free NH3 in functionalized biochar with H2O/NH3·H2O activation for promotion of new ammonia-based carbon capture
10.1016/j.cej.2020.128193 ↗81. Recent progress in electrochemical synthesis of ammonia from nitrogen: Strategies to improve the catalytic activity and selectivity
10.1039/d0ee02263b ↗82. Selective preparation of biomass-derived porous carbon with controllable pore sizes toward highly efficient CO2 capture
10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.204 ↗83. 5 Ultramicropore-rich renewable porous carbon from biomass tar with excellent adsorption capacity and selectivity for CO2 capture
10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.206 ↗85. Synergistic effect of nitrogen doping and ultra-microporosity on the performance of biomass and microalgae-derived activated carbons for CO2 capture
10.1021/acsami.0c10218 ↗88. Evaluation of activated carbons produced from Maize Cob Waste for adsorption-based CO2 separation and biogas upgrading
10.1016/j.jece.2021.107065 ↗89. Biomethane upgrading to transportation fuel quality using spent coffee for carbon dioxide capture in pressure swing adsorption
10.1016/j.jece.2022.107169 ↗94. Biogas purification by means of adsorption on pine sawdust-based activated carbon: Impact of water vapor
10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.100 ↗97. B.-N. Ho , “Study of the performance of modified and commercial activated carbons for natural gas treatment and biogas upgrading,” in thesis (Université de Pau et des Pays de L’Adour, 2021).
98. Biogas upgrading by adsorption onto activated carbon and carbon molecular sieves: Experimental and modelling study in binary CO2/CH4 mixture
10.1016/j.jece.2021.106256 ↗