journal article·2024-04-01Open access

Enhancing carbon capture efficiency in biogas upgrading: A comprehensive review on adsorbents and adsorption isotherms

Mahmoud M. Selim, Abdelouahed Tounsi, Hassanien Gomaa, Mohamed Shenashen

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 4

Abstract

Biogas results from the anaerobic digestion of organic materials, a reliable and sustainable process that simultaneously manages organic waste and generates renewable energy. However, the presence of secondary impurities, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and other gases, in raw biogas diminishes its efficacy, significantly lowering its energy content and restricting its utility across industry sectors. Moreover, these impurities contribute to various health and environmental concerns, including their role in exacerbating climate change and global warming. Consequently, efficient separation of CO2 is essential for upgrading biogas. The interest in utilizing biogas as a transportation fuel or as a substitute for natural gas has spurred the advancement of biogas upgrading technologies. While various methods exist for biogas upgrading, those relying on carbon dioxide absorption stand out as particularly significant. Carbon capture efficiency in biogas upgrading pertains to the ability of a method to effectively capture and separate CO2 from biogas, typically composed of methane (CH4) and other gases. This process is crucial for producing high-quality biogas with minimal carbon emissions, thus promoting environmental sustainability. Enhancing the carbon capture efficiency of the biogas upgrading process is essential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting cleaner energy production. The efficacy of CO2 separation relies on adsorbents and adsorption isotherms, which are integral components of this process. Improving these elements is vital for enhancing biogas purity, ensuring its suitability for various applications, and mitigating its environmental footprint. Traditional methods enhance the carbon capture efficiency by employing adsorbents, such as zeolites and activated carbon, as well as by optimizing adsorption isotherms. Surface modifications and adjustments to process parameters have also led to improved CO2 selectivity over other gases. Traditional methods still have drawbacks, such poor selectivity, difficulties with regeneration, and scalability. These limitations draw attention to the necessity of ongoing optimization, investigating substitute materials, and gaining a thorough grasp of how capacities, kinetics, and selectivity interact. Adsorbents and adsorption isotherms are the main topics of this study’s thorough analysis, which examines the state of the art in increasing carbon capture efficiency in biogas upgrading. It discusses conventional methods, their drawbacks, and suggests alternate materials, customized adjustments, and optimization techniques as a means of achieving ongoing progress. It is suggested that customized changes, ongoing optimization, and investigation of substitute materials be used to increase the effectiveness of carbon capture. To guarantee consistency, the study suggested specific rules for the procurement, preparation, and calcining of materials such as eggshells. In addition, to balancing CO2 and CH4 adsorption, improving adsorbent composition and addressing scalability, long-term stability, and practical implementation challenges are critical. The results of this study direct future studies toward a more sustainable and efficient energy landscape by adding to our understanding of carbon capture in biogas upgrading.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Industrial Gas Emission Control · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University 1 , P.O. Box 710, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lebanese American University 2 , 309 Bassil Building, Byblos, Lebanon

Material and Hydrology Laboratory, University of Sidi Bel Abbes, Faculty of Technology, Civil Engineering Department 3 , Sidi Bel Abbes 22002, Algeria

School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology 4 , Tianjin 300401, China

Department of Petrochemical, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI) 5 , Nasr City 11727, Cairo, Egypt

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. PLC · 2012
2. Emerging green strategies for biogas upgrading through CO2 capture: From unconventional organic solvents to clathrate and semi-clathrate hydrates10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123196 ↗
3. A combination model based on wavelet transform for predicting the difference between monthly natural gas production and consumption of U.S.10.1016/j.energy.2021.121216 ↗
4. Fastest-growing source prediction of US electricity production based on a novel hybrid model using wavelet transform10.1002/er.7293 ↗
5. Biological carbon capture from biogas streams: Insights into Cupriavidus necator autotrophic growth and transcriptional profile10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130556 ↗
6. Consequential effects of increased biofuel demand in Spain: Global crop area and CO2 emissions from indirect land use change10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.009 ↗
7. Carbon dioxide removal potential from decentralised bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and the relevance of operational choices10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106406 ↗
8. Cost, environmental impact, and resilience of renewable energy under a changing climate: A review10.1007/s10311-022-01532-8 ↗
9. A global assessment: Can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050?10.3390/su14084792 ↗
10. Explaining the drivers of technological innovation systems: The case of biogas technologies in mature markets10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120819 ↗
11. In-situ biogas upgrading in thermophilic granular UASB reactor: Key factors affecting the hydrogen mass transfer rate10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.083 ↗
12. RETRACTED: Biogas production–A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.093 ↗
13. Performance of a biogas upgrading process based on alkali absorption with regeneration using air pollution control residues10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.022 ↗
14. Technologies for biogas upgrading to biomethane: A review10.3390/bioengineering6040092 ↗
15. Advances in modification of commercial activated carbon for enhancement of CO2 capture10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.108 ↗
16. The removal and capture of CO2 from biogas by vacuum pressure swing process using silica gel10.1016/j.jcou.2018.08.001 ↗
17. Biogas upgrading using a single-membrane system: A review10.3390/membranes14040080 ↗
18. Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.011 ↗
19. Review of trends in biogas upgradation technologies and future perspectives10.1016/j.biteb.2018.01.002 ↗
20. Life cycle inventories of waste treatment services
21. 2010
22. Biogas impurities: Environmental and health implications, removal technologies and future perspectives10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10929 ↗
23. Biowaste-to-biomethane: An LCA study on biogas and syngas roads10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.030 ↗
24. Biomethane production from anaerobic co-digestion at wastewater treatment plants: A critical review on development and innovations in biogas upgrading techniques10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142753 ↗
25. Barriers in biogas production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A circular bioeconomy perspective10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127671 ↗
26. Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from the European urban wastewater sector, and options for their reduction10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156322 ↗
27. Comprehending the contemporary state of art in biogas enrichment and CO2 capture technologies via swing adsorption10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.116 ↗
28. CO2 capture on natural zeolite clinoptilolite: Effect of temperature and role of the adsorption sites10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111229 ↗
29. An overview of biogas upgrading via pressure swing adsorption: Navigating through bibliometric insights towards a conceptual framework and future research pathways10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118268 ↗
30. Hydrogen-enriched biogas premixed charge combustion and emissions in direct injection and indirect injection diesel dual fueled engines: A comparative study10.1115/1.4051574 ↗
31. Evaluating the scientific contributions of biogas technology on rural development through scientometric analysis10.1016/j.eti.2021.101879 ↗
32. Life cycle assessment of electricity from biogas: A systematic literature review10.1002/ep.13133 ↗
33. Experimental and modeling analyzing the biogas upgrading in the microchannel: Carbon dioxide capture by seawater enriched with low-cost waste materials10.1016/j.eti.2022.102770 ↗
34. Improving the performance of vacuum swing adsorption based CO2 capture under reduced recovery requirements10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102902 ↗
35. Biogas upgrading by cryogenic techniques10.1007/s10311-019-00872-2 ↗
36. Comparative life cycle assessment of polymeric membranes: Polyacrylonitrile, polyvinylimidazole and poly (acrylonitrile-co-vinylimidazole) applied for CO2 sequestration10.1016/j.eti.2021.101507 ↗
37. Janus particles with pH switchable properties for high-efficiency adsorption of PPCPs in water10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2021.106702 ↗
38. Compost from municipal solid wastes as a source of biochar for CO2 capture10.1002/ceat.201900108 ↗
39. Intensified biogas upgrading via various wastewater using microchannel10.1016/j.cep.2022.108927 ↗
40. Chapter 4—Factors affecting CO2 and CH4 separation during biogas upgrading in a water scrubbing process
41. Unveiling the critical role of biogas compositions on carbon dioxide separation in biogas upgrading using pressure swing adsorption10.1007/s13399-021-02106-4 ↗
42. Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: State of the art and future challenges10.1039/d0cs00025f ↗
43. Design and operation of an industrial size adsorption-based cleaning system for biogas use in fuel cells10.1016/j.energy.2022.124941 ↗
44. Facile fabrication of iron-modified biochar as a renewable adsorbent for efficient siloxane (L2) removal10.1016/j.jece.2021.105799 ↗
45. On the adsorption/oxidation of hydrogen sulfide on activated carbons at ambient temperatures10.1006/jcis.2001.7952 ↗
46. Ultra-microporous biochar-based carbon adsorbents by a facile chemical activation strategy for high-performance CO2 adsorption10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107613 ↗
47. How much can novel solid sorbents reduce the cost of post-combustion CO2 capture? A techno-economic investigation on the cost limits of pressure–vacuum swing adsorption10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117955 ↗
48. CO2 capture activity of a novel CaO adsorbent stabilized with (ZrO2 + Al2O3 + CeO2)-based additive under mild and realistic calcium looping conditions10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101747 ↗
49. Adsorption technology for CO2 separation and capture: A perspective10.1007/s10450-014-9603-2 ↗
50. 2012 · 347
51. Adsorption equilibria of CO2 and CH4 in cation-exchanged zeolites 13X10.1007/s10450-015-9738-9 ↗
52. Simplistic approach for preliminary screening of potential carbon adsorbents for CO2 separation from biogas10.1016/j.jcou.2018.10.001 ↗
53. On the use of plastic precursors for preparation of activated carbons and their evaluation in CO2 capture for biogas upgrading: A review10.1016/j.wasman.2023.02.022 ↗
54. Carbon dioxide capture through physical and chemical adsorption using porous carbon materials: A review10.3390/atmos13030397 ↗
55. Development of a general evaluation metric for rapid screening of adsorbent materials for postcombustion CO2 capture10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01418 ↗
56. A review on the state-of-the-art of physical/chemical and biological technologies for biogas upgrading10.1007/s11157-015-9379-1 ↗
57. A review of biogas purification processes10.1002/bbb.117 ↗
58. Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033 ↗
59. An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.017 ↗
60. CO2-selective membranes for hydrogen production and CO2 capture–Part II: Techno-economic analysis10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.042 ↗
61. Biogas from palm oil mill effluent: Characterization and removal of CO2 using modified clinoptilolite zeolites in a fixed-bed column10.14716/ijtech.v7i4.2207 ↗
62. Cost-effective CO2 capture based on in silico screening of zeolites and process optimization10.1039/c3cp53627k ↗
63. CO2-selective membranes for hydrogen production and CO2 capture–Part I: Membrane development10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.020 ↗
64. Exploring new sources of efficiency in process-driven materials screening for post-combustion carbon capture10.1039/c9ee03977e ↗
65. Exploring the limits of adsorption-based CO2 capture using MOFs with PVSA–from molecular design to process economics10.1039/c9me00102f ↗
66. Production of high purity CO2 from air using solid amine sorbents10.1016/j.cesx.2019.100020 ↗
67. Novel post-treatment of ultrasound assisting with acid washing enhance lignin-based biochar for CO2 capture: Adsorption performance and mechanism10.1016/j.cej.2023.144523 ↗
68. Development of biomass derived highly porous fast adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118506 ↗
69. Activated carbons derived from residual biomass pyrolysis and their CO2 adsorption capacity10.1016/j.jaap.2014.09.021 ↗
70. Effects of surface chemical properties of activated carbon fibers modified by liquid oxidation for CO2 adsorption10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.046 ↗
71. Preparation of porous carbons with high low-pressure CO2 uptake by KOH activation of rice husk char10.1016/j.fuel.2014.08.027 ↗
72. Biomass derived low-cost microporous adsorbents for efficient CO2 capture10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.032 ↗
73. Cooperative insertion of CO2 in diamine-appended metal-organic frameworks10.1038/nature14327 ↗
74. Functionalization of metal–organic frameworks for enhanced stability under humid carbon dioxide capture conditions10.1002/cssc.201500580 ↗
75. Performance-based screening of porous materials for carbon capture10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266 ↗
76. Enhanced dynamic CO2 adsorption capacity and CO2/CH4 selectivity on polyethylenimine-impregnated UiO-6610.1021/acs.iecr.5b03517 ↗
77. Highly efficient CO2 capture with a metal–organic framework-derived porous carbon impregnated with polyethyleneimine10.1002/aoc.4390 ↗
78. Incorporation of acetate-based ionic liquids into a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) as efficient sorbents for carbon dioxide capture10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.104 ↗
79. Design of steam-assisted temperature vacuum-swing adsorption processes for efficient CO2 capture from ambient air10.1016/j.rser.2020.110651 ↗
80. Adsorption-enrichment characterization of CO2 and dynamic retention of free NH3 in functionalized biochar with H2O/NH3·H2O activation for promotion of new ammonia-based carbon capture10.1016/j.cej.2020.128193 ↗
81. Recent progress in electrochemical synthesis of ammonia from nitrogen: Strategies to improve the catalytic activity and selectivity10.1039/d0ee02263b ↗
82. Selective preparation of biomass-derived porous carbon with controllable pore sizes toward highly efficient CO2 capture10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.204 ↗
83. 5 Ultramicropore-rich renewable porous carbon from biomass tar with excellent adsorption capacity and selectivity for CO2 capture10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.206 ↗
84. Microporous carbon nanoflakes derived from biomass cork waste for CO2 capture10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142465 ↗
85. Synergistic effect of nitrogen doping and ultra-microporosity on the performance of biomass and microalgae-derived activated carbons for CO2 capture10.1021/acsami.0c10218 ↗
86. Carbonaceous materials as adsorbents for CO2 capture: Synthesis and modification10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100039 ↗
87. Facile synthesis of CuBTC and its graphene oxide composites as efficient adsorbents for CO2 capture10.1016/j.cej.2020.124666 ↗
88. Evaluation of activated carbons produced from Maize Cob Waste for adsorption-based CO2 separation and biogas upgrading10.1016/j.jece.2021.107065 ↗
89. Biomethane upgrading to transportation fuel quality using spent coffee for carbon dioxide capture in pressure swing adsorption10.1016/j.jece.2022.107169 ↗
90. Carbon adsorbents for CO2 capture from bio-hydrogen and biogas streams: Breakthrough adsorption study10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.100 ↗
91. Breakthrough CO2 adsorption in bio-based activated carbons10.1016/j.jes.2015.03.008 ↗
92. Separation of carbon dioxide for biogas upgrading to biomethane10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.037 ↗
93. Adsorption equilibrium and thermodynamics of CO2 and CH4 on carbon molecular sieves10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.050 ↗
94. Biogas purification by means of adsorption on pine sawdust-based activated carbon: Impact of water vapor10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.100 ↗
95. Impregnation of Chitosan onto activated carbon for adsorption selectivity towards CO2: Biohydrogen purification10.14416/j.ijast.2016.03.003 ↗
96. Methane enrichment of biogas using carbon capture materials10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126428 ↗
97. B.-N. Ho , “Study of the performance of modified and commercial activated carbons for natural gas treatment and biogas upgrading,” in thesis (Université de Pau et des Pays de L’Adour, 2021).
98. Biogas upgrading by adsorption onto activated carbon and carbon molecular sieves: Experimental and modelling study in binary CO2/CH4 mixture10.1016/j.jece.2021.106256 ↗
99. Biogas upgrade using modified natural clay10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100134 ↗
100. Biogas improving by adsorption of CO2 on modified waste tea activated carbon10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.104 ↗