Intelligent damage recognition of composite materials based on deep learning and ultrasonic testing
Source abstract
Abstract
Ultrasonic non-destructive testing can effectively detect damage in aircraft composite materials, but traditional manual testing is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To realize the intelligent recognition of aircraft composite material damage, this paper proposes a 1D-YOLO network, in which intelligent fusion recognizes both the ultrasonic C-scan image and ultrasonic A-scan signal of composite material damage. Through training and testing the composite material damage data on aircraft skin, the accuracy of the model is 94.5%, the mean average precision is 80.0%, and the kappa value is 97.5%. The use of dilated convolution and a recursive feature pyramid effectively improves the feature extraction ability of the model. The effectively used Cascade R-CNN (Cascade Region-Convolutional Neural Network) improves the recognition effect of the model, and the effectively used one-dimensional convolutional neural network excludes non-damaged objects. Comparing our network with YOLOv3, YOLOv4, cascade R-CNN, and other networks, the results show that our network can identify the damage of composite materials more accurately.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Air Force Engineering University 1 , Xi’an 710038, China
Xi’an Jiaotong University 2 , Xi’an 710049, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of composite materials10.1115/1.3167081 ↗
2. 2004
3. A simplified approach to continuous damage of composite materials and micromechanical analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.044 ↗
4. On low-velocity impact testing of composite materials10.1177/002199838802200103 ↗
5. Damage identification in aircraft composite structures: A case study using various non-destructive testing techniques10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.080 ↗
6. Infrared thermography for temperature measurement and non-destructive testing10.3390/s140712305 ↗
7. X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer10.1364/opex.13.006296 ↗
8. Automatic recognition of weld defects in TOFD D-scan images based on faster R-CNN10.1520/jte20170563 ↗
9. Deep learning framework based on integration of S-Mask R-CNN and inception-v3 for ultrasound image-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer10.1016/j.future.2020.08.015 ↗
10. Breast tumor segmentation in 3D automatic breast ultrasound using mask scoring R-CNN10.1002/mp.14569 ↗
11. Temporal and spatial deep learning network for infrared thermal defect detection10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102164 ↗
12. The use of intelligent computational tools for damage detection and identification with an emphasis on composites—A review10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.002 ↗
13. Ultrasonic signal classification and imaging system for composite materials via deep convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.neucom.2016.11.066 ↗
14. Convolutional neural network for ultrasonic weldment flaw classification in noisy conditions10.1016/j.ultras.2018.12.001 ↗
15. Classification of micro-damage in piezoelectric ceramics using machine learning of ultrasound signals10.3390/s19194216 ↗
16. Deconvolution of ultrasonic signals using a convolutional neural network10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106312 ↗
17. Automatic feature extraction based on meta-learning for ultrasonic flaw classification
18. CNN based defect recognition model for phased array ultrasonic testing images of electrofusion joints
19. A. Bochkovskiy, C.-Y. Wang, and H.-Y. M. Liao, “YOLOv4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection,” arXiv:2004.10934 (2020).
20. S. Qiao, L. C. Chen, and A. Yuille, “DetectoRS: Detecting objects with recursive feature pyramid and switchable atrous convolution,” arXiv:2006.02334 (2020).10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01008 ↗
21. Cascade R-CNN: Delving into high quality object detection
22. J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, “YOLOv3: An incremental improvement,” arXiv:1804.02767 (2018).
23. CSPNet: A new backbone that can enhance learning capability of CNN
24. F. Yu and V. Koltun, “Multi-scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions,” arXiv:1511.07122 (2015).
25. Feature pyramid networks for object detection
26. Signal status recognition based on 1DCNN and its feature extraction mechanism analysis10.3390/s19092018 ↗