A data-driven physics-informed neural network for predicting the viscosity of nanofluids
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanofluids have been applied in various fields, such as solar collectors, petroleum engineering, and chemical engineering, due to their superior properties compared to traditional fluids. Among the various thermophysical properties of nanofluids, viscosity plays a critical role in thermal applications involving heat transfer and fluid flow. While several conventional machine learning (ML) techniques have been proposed to predict viscosity, these conventional models require many experimental measurements to be optimized and make accurate predictions. This study reports a novel ML method using a multi-fidelity neural network (MFNN) to accurately predict the viscosity of nanofluids by incorporating the physical laws into the model. The MFNN correlates a low-fidelity dataset derived from the prediction of the theoretical model with a high-fidelity dataset, which consists of experimental measurements. It is shown that the MFNN can recover the rheology of nanofluids and outperforms the conventional artificial neural network due to incorporating the underlying physics of nanofluids into a model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Heat Transfer Mechanisms · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Northeastern University , 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Rheological and flow characteristics of nanofluids: Influence of electroviscous effects and particle agglomeration10.1063/1.3182807 ↗
2. Investigations of thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.05.004 ↗
3. Enhanced oil recovery by using electromagnetic-assisted nanofluids: A review10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113095 ↗
4. Energy and exergy comparison of a flat-plate solar collector using water, Al2O3 nanofluid, and CuO nanofluid10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113959 ↗
5. Enhancing the performance of parabolic trough collectors using nanofluids and turbulators10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.091 ↗
6. Design and optimization of a combined solar thermophotovoltaic power generation and solid oxide electrolyser for hydrogen production10.1016/j.enconman.2018.09.033 ↗
7. Recent research contributions concerning use of nanofluids in heat exchangers: A critical review10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.01.041 ↗
8. Recent advances in application of nanofluids in heat transfer devices: A critical review10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.057 ↗
9. Effect of surfactant type on buckypaper electrochemical performance10.1049/mnl.2017.0691 ↗
10. X-Fe2O4-buckypaper-chitosan nanocomposites for nonenzymatic electrochemical glucose biosensing
11. Accurate prediction of nanofluid viscosity using a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN)10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.03.031 ↗
12. Degradation of dissolved RDX, NQ, and DNAN by cathodic processes in an electrochemical flow-through reactor10.1016/j.jece.2022.107865 ↗
13. Viscosity of nanofluids based on an artificial intelligence model10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.02.008 ↗
14. Temperature and particle-size dependent viscosity data for water-based nanofluids–hysteresis phenomenon10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.02.004 ↗
15. Effects of temperature and particle size on the thermal property measurements of Al2O3–water nanofluids10.1021/je1006407 ↗
16. A novel correlation approach for viscosity prediction of water based nanofluids of Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2 and CuO10.1016/j.jtice.2015.05.032 ↗
17. 1905
18. The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles10.1017/s0022112077001062 ↗
19. The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions10.1063/1.1700493 ↗
20. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles10.1080/08916159808946559 ↗
21. Viscosity data for Al2O3–water nanofluid—hysteresis: Is heat transfer enhancement using nanofluids reliable?10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.01.033 ↗
22. Three-body hydrodynamic effects on viscosity of suspensions of spheres10.1063/1.460555 ↗
23. A new model for calculating the effective viscosity of nanofluids10.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055501 ↗
24. Predicting the effective viscosity of nanofluids based on the rheology of suspensions of solid particles10.1016/j.jksus.2017.09.016 ↗
25. Statistical review of studies on the estimation of thermophysical properties of nanofluids using artificial neural network (ANN)10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117210 ↗
26. Neural network and deep-learning algorithms used in QSAR studies: Merits and drawbacks10.1016/j.drudis.2018.06.016 ↗
27. Mineral prospectivity prediction via convolutional neural networks based on geological big data10.1007/s12583-020-1365-z ↗
28. Performance, evaluation, and modeling of an integrated petroleum refinery wastewater treatment system using multi-layer perceptron neural networks10.5004/dwt.2021.26616 ↗
29. A direct adaptive neural-network control for unknown nonlinear systems and its application10.1109/72.655026 ↗
30. Modeling the viscosity of nanofluids using artificial neural network and Bayesian support vector regression10.1063/5.0008977 ↗
31. A review on the utilized machine learning approaches for modeling the dynamic viscosity of nanofluids10.1016/j.rser.2019.109345 ↗
32. Data-driven physics-informed constitutive metamodeling of complex fluids: A multifidelity neural network (MFNN) framework10.1122/8.0000138 ↗
33. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
34. DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations10.1137/19m1274067 ↗
35. fPINNs: Fractional physics-informed neural networks10.1137/18m1229845 ↗
36. nPINNs: Nonlocal physics-informed neural networks for a parametrized nonlocal universal laplacian operator. Algorithms and applications10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109760 ↗
37. How effective are neural networks at forecasting and prediction? A review and evaluation10.1002/(sici)1099-131x(1998090)17:5/6<481::aid-for709>3.0.co;2-q ↗
38. Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research10.1016/s0731-7085(99)00272-1 ↗
39. An overview of overfitting and its solutions10.1088/1742-6596/1168/2/022022 ↗
40. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks
41. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
42. Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude
43. M. D. Zeiler, “ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method,” arXiv:1212.5701 (2012).
44. Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization