journal article·2018-05-01Open access

Performance limit of daytime radiative cooling in warm humid environment

Takahiro Suichi, Atsushi Ishikawa, Yasuhiko Hayashi, Kenji Tsuruta

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

Daytime radiative cooling potentially offers efficient passive cooling, but the performance is naturally limited by the environment, such as the ambient temperature and humidity. Here, we investigate the performance limit of daytime radiative cooling under warm and humid conditions in Okayama, Japan. A cooling device, consisting of alternating layers of SiO2 and poly(methyl methacrylate) on an Al mirror, is fabricated and characterized to demonstrate a high reflectance for sunlight and a selective thermal radiation in the mid-infrared region. In the temperature measurement under the sunlight irradiation, the device shows 3.4 °C cooler than a bare Al mirror, but 2.8 °C warmer than the ambient of 35 °C. The corresponding numerical analyses reveal that the atmospheric window in λ = 16 ∼ 25 μm is closed due to a high humidity, thereby limiting the net emission power of the device. Our study on the humidity influence on the cooling performance provides a general guide line of how one can achieve practical passive cooling in a warm humid environment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Urban Heat Island Mitigation · Optical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Okayama University , Okayama, Okayama 700-8530, Japan

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1980 · 36 · 13910.1063/1.91406 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 420510.1063/1.329270 ↗
3. Appl. Opt. · 1981 · 20 · 260610.1364/ao.20.002606 ↗
4. Nat. Energy · 2017 · 2 · 1714310.1038/nenergy.2017.143 ↗
5. Optica · 2014 · 1 · 3210.1364/optica.1.000032 ↗
6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2015 · 112 · 1228210.1073/pnas.1509453112 ↗
7. ACS Photon. · 2017 · 4 · 77410.1021/acsphotonics.7b00089 ↗
8. Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2015 · 3 · 104710.1002/adom.201500119 ↗
9. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1372910.1038/ncomms13729 ↗
10. Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 145710.1021/nl4004283 ↗
11. Nature · 2014 · 515 · 54010.1038/nature13883 ↗
12. Science · 2017 · 355 · 106210.1126/science.aai7899 ↗
13. ACS Photon · 2017 · 4 · 62610.1021/acsphotonics.6b00991 ↗
14. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. · 2005 · 86 · 24510.1175/bams-86-2-245 ↗
15. Science · 1983 · 220 · 67110.1126/science.220.4598.671 ↗
16. J. Optim. Theory Appl. · 1985 · 45 · 4110.1007/bf00940812 ↗
17. J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2006 · 352 · 76910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.004 ↗
18. Appl. Opt. · 2007 · 46 · 811810.1364/ao.46.008118 ↗
19. Opt. Spectrosc. · 2006 · 101 · 71610.1134/s0030400x06110105 ↗
20. Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2009 · 116 · 58510.12693/aphyspola.116.585 ↗
21. Appl. Opt. · 1998 · 37 · 527110.1364/ao.37.005271 ↗
22. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 541510.1039/c3cp43856b ↗
23. 1992
24. Tenki · 2012 · 59 · 917