A lightweight low-frequency sound insulation membrane-type acoustic metamaterial
Source abstract
Abstract
A novel membrane-type acoustic metamaterial with a high sound transmission loss (STL) at low frequencies (⩽500Hz) was designed and the mechanisms were investigated by using negative mass density theory. This metamaterial’s structure is like a sandwich with a thin (thickness=0.25mm) lightweight flexible rubber material within two layers of honeycomb cell plates. Negative mass density was demonstrated at frequencies below the first natural frequency, which results in the excellent low-frequency sound insulation. The effects of different structural parameters of the membrane on the sound-proofed performance at low frequencies were investigated by using finite element method (FEM). The numerical results show that, the STL can be modulated to higher value by changing the structural parameters, such as the membrane surface density, the unite cell film shape, and the membrane tension. The acoustic metamaterial proposed in this study could provide a potential application in the low-frequency noise insulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Noise Effects and Management · Wind and Air Flow Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 School of Mechanical Engineering and State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, , Xi’an 710049, China .
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2 National Center for Supercomputer Application, , Urbana-Champaign, IL61801 USA
Funding
Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University · The National Basic Research Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2014 · 344 · 137310.1126/science.1252291 ↗
2. Science · 2000 · 289 · 173410.1126/science.289.5485.1734 ↗
3. Physics Letters A · 2004 · 327 · 51210.1016/j.physleta.2004.05.047 ↗
4. Physical Review Letters · 2004 · 93
5. Physical Review B · 2002 · 65
6. Physical Review Letters · 2002 · 8810.1103/PhysRevLett.88.225502 ↗
7. Applied Physics Letters · 2004 · 84 · 336410.1063/1.1723688 ↗
8. Physical Review B · 2011 · 8410.1103/PhysRevB.84.165136 ↗
9. Journal of Applied Physics · 2014 · 116 · 10351410.1063/1.4895490 ↗
10. Physics Letters A · 2012 · 376 · 283410.1016/j.physleta.2012.08.057 ↗
11. Noise Control Engineering Journal · 2015 · 63 · 2010.3397/1/376303 ↗
12. Physical Review Letters · 2008 · 101
13. Journal of Applied Physics · 2010 · 108 · 11490510.1063/1.3514082 ↗
14. Journal of Applied Physics · 2011 · 109 · 10490210.1063/1.3583656 ↗
15. Physics Letters A · 2012 · 376 · 148910.1016/j.physleta.2012.03.010 ↗
16. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2014 · 136 · 96910.1121/1.4892870 ↗
17. Applied Physics Letters · 2015 · 106 · 09190410.1063/1.4913999 ↗
18. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015 · 137 · 229810.1121/1.4920389 ↗
19. Physics Letters A · 2009 · 373 · 446410.1016/j.physleta.2009.10.013 ↗
20. New Journal of Physics · 2010 · 12 · 10302510.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103025 ↗
21. Applied Acoustics · 2013 · 74 · 48510.1016/j.apacoust.2012.09.008 ↗
22. Applied Physics Letters · 2015 · 106 · 17190510.1063/1.4919235 ↗
23. International Journal of Impact Engineering · 2005 · 32 · 61810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.001 ↗
24. Nature Communications · 2012 · 3 · 75610.1038/ncomms1758 ↗