journal article·2012-09-01Open access

Large enhanced perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in CoFeB/MgO system with the typical Ta buffer replaced by an Hf layer

T. Liu, J. W. Cai, Li Sun

AIP Advances· Volume 2· Issue 3

Abstract

By systematically comparing the magnetic properties of the Ta/CoFeB/Ta and MgO/CoFeB/MgO structures with and without a submonolayer of MgO, Ta, V, Nb, Hf and W inserted in the middle of the CoFeB layer, we have proved that the observed perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) in Ta/CoFeB/MgO sandwiches is solely originated from the CoFeB/MgO interface with the Ta buffer acting to enhance the CoFeB/MgO interface anisotropy significantly. Moreover, replacing Ta with Hf causes the CoFeB/MgO interfacial PMA further enhanced by 35%, and the CoFeB layer with perpendicular magnetization has a much larger critical thickness accordingly, leaving a wider thickness margin for the CoFeB/MgO-based perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction optimization. Also the sputter deposited thin Hf films are amorphous with low surface roughness. These results will ensure the Hf/CoFeB/MgO more promising material system for PMA device development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · ZnO doping and properties · Magnetic Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, , Beijing 100190, P. R. China

University of Houston 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Center for Superconductivity (TcSUH), , Houston, Texas 77204, USA

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 21010.1038/nmat1595 ↗
2. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 72110.1038/nmat2804 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Express · 2010 · 3 · 05300310.1143/APEX.3.053003 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 524610.1063/1.1459605 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 07A91110.1063/1.2840016 ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2008 · 44 · 257310.1109/TMAG.2008.2003059 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 17250210.1063/1.2913163 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 23250810.1063/1.3524230 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 10250810.1063/1.2894198 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 07A91710.1063/1.2838754 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 57010.1103/PhysRevB.62.570 ↗
12. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 02250110.1063/1.3536482 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 04250310.1063/1.3299009 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 01251210.1063/1.3064162 ↗
16. Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 6410.1038/nmat3171 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 05440110.1103/PhysRevB.84.054401 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 02250110.1063/1.3536482 ↗
19. 2000 · 75
20. Appl. Phys. Express · 2011 · 4 · 01300210.1143/APEX.4.013002 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 12391010.1063/1.3592986 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 019250710.1063/1.3429594 ↗